Literature DB >> 19826301

Comparison of hamstring and gluteus muscles electromyographic activity while performing the razor curl vs. the traditional prone hamstring curl.

Gretchen D Oliver1, Christopher P Dougherty.   

Abstract

This study examined the muscle activation of the razor curl functional hamstring exercise (the razor curl has the total body extended and then requires the hips and knees to flex to 90 degrees simultaneously with full contraction of the hamstrings to further the knee flexion) to the traditional prone hamstring curl. Eight healthy, female intercollegiate athletes participated (mean age 20.8 +/- 3.9 y; mean height, 177.8 +/- 10.9 cm; mean weight, 67.3 +/- 9.9 kg). Electromyographic (EMG) data were collected on the following muscles: medial hamstring (semimembranosus and semitendinosus), biceps femoris, gluteus medius, and gluteus maximus while participants performed the 2 exercises: razor curl and the traditional prone curl. Results revealed no significant differences between muscle activations during the 2 exercises (p <or= 0.05). Also noted that, when examining the means of each muscle's percent of their maximum isometric voluntary contraction, the razor curl displayed a greater total activation. The investigators were able to conclude that the prone hamstring curl does, indeed, target the musculature of the hamstrings. However, it has been shown here that the more functional position of the razor curl does, indeed, achieve activation of not only the hamstring muscle group but also the gluteus medius and maximus. Both the traditional prone hamstring and the razor curl allow for hamstring and gluteals activation. However, if one wants to fully train the hamstrings functionally, one should focus on the razor curl. Due to its functionality, the razor curl is designed to increase hamstring contractibility by placing the hip into flexion. The razor curl is easily implemented on a back extension machine, where first one should focus on the form and then on functional speed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19826301     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b8d34b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  3 in total

1.  Muscle activation of the torso during the modified razor curl hamstring exercise.

Authors:  Gretchen D Oliver; Audrey J Stone; James W Wyman; Ivan N Blazquez
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-02

2.  Contractile function and motor unit firing rates of the human hamstrings.

Authors:  Eric A Kirk; Charles L Rice
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Biceps femoris and semitendinosus--teammates or competitors? New insights into hamstring injury mechanisms in male football players: a muscle functional MRI study.

Authors:  Joke Schuermans; Damien Van Tiggelen; Lieven Danneels; Erik Witvrouw
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 13.800

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.