PURPOSE: The aim of axillary reverse mapping (ARM) is to preserve arm lymphatics in patients with breast cancer who underwent surgical axillary staging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 2007 to December 2008, 49 patients who required axillary dissection (AD) underwent ARM. One milliliter of patent blue dye was injected in the ipsilateral arm, and all blue nodes identified during AD were sent separately for pathologic examination. Main variables associated with the detection rates of blue lymphatics, the pathologic status of blue and nonblue nodes, and the complications of the procedure were analyzed. Results Identification rates of blue lymphatics and blue nodes were 73.5% and 55.1%, respectively. Blue node identification was influenced by the time elapsed between injection of blue dye and surgery (P = .002) but not by the learning curve of the procedure. Although the blue node was clear of metastases in 24 of 27 patients, three patients with extensive nodal metastatic involvement (ie, pN2a and pN3a) showed breast cancer metastatic cells in the blue nodes as well. The only adverse effect of the procedure was skin tattooing at the injection site, which disappeared within 4 months in almost 80% of the procedures. CONCLUSION: In patients with clinically negative axillary nodes, additional study is warranted to assess whether ARM may be used to spare the lymphatics from the arm. In the presence of extensive nodal disease, this technique may identify metastatic blue nodes, which demonstrates that there is not reliable separation of arm and breast lymphatic pathways.
PURPOSE: The aim of axillary reverse mapping (ARM) is to preserve arm lymphatics in patients with breast cancer who underwent surgical axillary staging. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 2007 to December 2008, 49 patients who required axillary dissection (AD) underwent ARM. One milliliter of patent blue dye was injected in the ipsilateral arm, and all blue nodes identified during AD were sent separately for pathologic examination. Main variables associated with the detection rates of blue lymphatics, the pathologic status of blue and nonblue nodes, and the complications of the procedure were analyzed. Results Identification rates of blue lymphatics and blue nodes were 73.5% and 55.1%, respectively. Blue node identification was influenced by the time elapsed between injection of blue dye and surgery (P = .002) but not by the learning curve of the procedure. Although the blue node was clear of metastases in 24 of 27 patients, three patients with extensive nodal metastatic involvement (ie, pN2a and pN3a) showed breast cancer metastatic cells in the blue nodes as well. The only adverse effect of the procedure was skin tattooing at the injection site, which disappeared within 4 months in almost 80% of the procedures. CONCLUSION: In patients with clinically negative axillary nodes, additional study is warranted to assess whether ARM may be used to spare the lymphatics from the arm. In the presence of extensive nodal disease, this technique may identify metastatic blue nodes, which demonstrates that there is not reliable separation of arm and breast lymphatic pathways.
Authors: Funda Meric-Bernstam; John C Rasmussen; Savitri Krishnamurthy; I-Chih Tan; Banghe Zhu; Jamie L Wagner; Gildy V Babiera; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Eva M Sevick-Muraca Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: K Shiva Kumar; G N Hemanth; Poonam K Panjwani; Suraj Manjunath; Rakesh S Ramesh; Rajaram Burrah; Pritilata Rout; D Ramu; Elvis Peter Joseph; Ravi Chandran; C Prasad; Vipin Goel; Supari Divya Journal: Indian J Surg Oncol Date: 2016-11-18
Authors: Caroline E Fife; Suzanne Davey; Erik A Maus; Renie Guilliod; Harvey N Mayrovitz Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kristen E Adams; John C Rasmussen; Chinmay Darne; I-Chih Tan; Melissa B Aldrich; Milton V Marshall; Caroline E Fife; Erik A Maus; Latisha A Smith; Renie Guilloid; Sunday Hoy; Eva M Sevick-Muraca Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 3.732