UNLABELLED: The lack of adequate minority representation, including Native-Americans (NA) and African-Americans (AA), in health related research is well documented. Nowhere is this truer than in the area of genomics-related research, which is especially troubling as NA and AA have some of the highest rates of overall morbidity and mortality due to genetic diseases. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to explore factors associated with the under representation of NA and AA adults in genetic research including: (1) decision barriers, (2) the influence of health care networks, (3) recruitment preferences, and (4) health conditions. METHODS: Eight focus groups were conducted, each by led by individuals who shared racial/cultural identification with participants. Adherence to tenants of Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) was maintained. Qualitative data were analyzed using NVIVO program analyses and the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Themes supported the efficacy of CBPR to help demolish barriers while facilitating a willingness to participate in genetics-related research. CONCLUSIONS: Community-based approaches may enhance representation of minorities in genomics-related research crucial to eliminating health disparities.
UNLABELLED: The lack of adequate minority representation, including Native-Americans (NA) and African-Americans (AA), in health related research is well documented. Nowhere is this truer than in the area of genomics-related research, which is especially troubling as NA and AA have some of the highest rates of overall morbidity and mortality due to genetic diseases. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to explore factors associated with the under representation of NA and AA adults in genetic research including: (1) decision barriers, (2) the influence of health care networks, (3) recruitment preferences, and (4) health conditions. METHODS: Eight focus groups were conducted, each by led by individuals who shared racial/cultural identification with participants. Adherence to tenants of Community Based Participatory Research (CBPR) was maintained. Qualitative data were analyzed using NVIVO program analyses and the constant comparative method. RESULTS: Themes supported the efficacy of CBPR to help demolish barriers while facilitating a willingness to participate in genetics-related research. CONCLUSIONS: Community-based approaches may enhance representation of minorities in genomics-related research crucial to eliminating health disparities.
Authors: Christine Makosky Daley; Aimee S James; Ezekiel Ulrey; Stephanie Joseph; Angelia Talawyma; Won S Choi; K Allen Greiner; M Kathryn Coe Journal: Qual Health Res Date: 2010-02-12
Authors: Mary E Northridge; Michele Shedlin; Eric W Schrimshaw; Ivette Estrada; Leydis De La Cruz; Rogelina Peralta; Stacia Birdsall; Sara S Metcalf; Bibhas Chakraborty; Carol Kunzel Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-06-09 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Sam S Oh; Joshua Galanter; Neeta Thakur; Maria Pino-Yanes; Nicolas E Barcelo; Marquitta J White; Danielle M de Bruin; Ruth M Greenblatt; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Alan H B Wu; Luisa N Borrell; Chris Gunter; Neil R Powe; Esteban G Burchard Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2015-12-15 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Neeta Thakur; Stephanie Lovinsky-Desir; Donna Appell; Christian Bime; Lauren Castro; Juan C Celedón; Juliana Ferreira; Maureen George; Yolanda Mageto; Arch G Mainous III; Smita Pakhale; Kristin A Riekert; Jesse Roman; Elizabeth Ruvalcaba; Sunil Sharma; Priya Shete; Juan P Wisnivesky; Fernando Holguin Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 21.405