| Literature DB >> 19824061 |
Katie A Burren1, John M Scott, Andrew J Copp, Nicholas D E Greene.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Suboptimal maternal folate status is considered a risk factor for neural tube defects (NTDs). However, the relationship between dietary folate status and risk of NTDs appears complex, as experimentally induced folate deficiency is insufficient to cause NTDs in nonmutant mice. In contrast, folate deficiency can exacerbate the effect of an NTD-causing mutation, as in splotch mice. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether folate deficiency can induce NTDs in mice with a permissive genetic background which do not normally exhibit defects.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 19824061 PMCID: PMC3071937 DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20632
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol ISSN: 1542-0752
Figure 1Effect of dietary folate deficiency on maternal blood folate (A) and plasma homocysteine (B). Folate-deficient (FD) conditions, imposed by a folate-free diet containing antibiotic, resulted in a significant reduction in maternal whole blood folate compared to standard diet (SD) and a significant increase in maternal plasma homocysteine. Inclusion of either dietary folate (FD+DF) or omission of antibiotic (FD+BF) had an intermediate effect on both maternal folate and homocysteine level. Significant differences compared to SD are indicated by * (p < 0.05) or ** (p < 0.001). Significant difference compared to FD diet is indicated by # (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the +/+ and ct/ct strains for any of the dietary conditions.
Impact of Folate-Deficient Diets on Litter Size and Resorption Rate
| Strain | Diet | No. litters | Total implants | Implants per litter | Resorptions per litter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | SD | 15 | 102 | 6.8 ± 0.8 | 0.7 ± 0.3 |
| FD | 14 | 68 | 4.9 ± 0.7 | 2.0 ± 0.7* | |
| FD+DF | 4 | 21 | 5.3 ± 0.7 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | |
| FD+BF | 4 | 23 | 5.8 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.3* | |
| SD | 17 | 123 | 7.2 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | |
| FD | 20 | 106 | 5.3 ± 0.5* | 2.3 ± 0.4* | |
| FD+DF | 7 | 47 | 6.7 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.2# | |
| FD+BF | 7 | 46 | 6.6 ± 0.3 | 1.9 ± 0.2* |
Total number of implantations and number of resorptions was recorded for litters collected at E11.5. Values are given as mean ± SEM. FD conditions resulted in smaller litter size and increased resorption rate (* indicates significant difference from SD, p < 0.05, ANOVA). The inclusion of dietary folate (FD+DF) reduced the resorption rate (# significant difference compared with FD, p < 0.05), whereas omission of antibiotic did not (* significant difference from SD, p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between +/+ and ct/ct litters for any parameter.
Figure 2Dietary folate deficiency causes embryonic growth retardation. The growth and developmental progression of +/+ and ct/ct embryos were assessed at E10.5 by analysis of (A) crown-rump length and (B) somite number. The folate-deficient diet (FD) resulted in a significant reduction in both parameters (**p < 0.02, compared to all other groups of same genotype). Inclusion of either dietary folate (FD+DF) or bacterial folate (FD+BF) improved both growth and developmental progression. However, crown-rump length and number of somites remained significantly lower for embryos on the FD+BF diet compared to standard (SD) conditions (*p < 0.02). No significant differences were observed between +/+ and ct/ct strains for any of the dietary conditions.
Embryonic Folate Content and Concentration in +/+ and ct/ct Embryos
| Strain | Diet | No. embryos | No. somites Mean (range) | Folate content (pg/embryo) | Folate concentration (pg/mg protein) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | SD | 18 | 29.8 (26–32) | 8244 ± 445 | 30.1 ± 3.3 |
| FD | 13 | 28.0 (26–32) | 5184 ± 282* | 37.3 ± 1.3 | |
| FD+FA | 5 | 28.8 (26–32) | 13,675 ± 598#* | 49.0 ± 9.2* | |
| SD | 10 | 28.4 (26–32) | 8822 ± 1527 | 28.8 ± 3.2 | |
| FD | 14 | 29.1 (26–32) | 5065 ± 419* | 23.4 ± 5.6 | |
| FD+FA | 7 | 28.1 (26–32) | 8877 ± 975# | 56.0 ± 7.9# |
Total folate content (mono- and polyglutamates) was determined in embryos from the standard diet (SD) and folate-deficiency (FD) groups that had reached an equivalent developmental stage (somite-stage matched). Values are given as mean ± SEM. Folate content did not differ between genotypes but was significantly diminished in FD conditions (*p < 0.05 compared with SD). Folate concentration did not differ either between genotypes or dietary groups. Folic acid treatment (FD+FA) resulted in a significant increase in folate content compared with untreated folate-deficient embryos (#p < 0.05 compared with FD).
Figure 3Folate deficiency increases the risk of cranial NTDs among +/+ and ct/ct embryos. Development on the folate-deficient (FD) diet resulted in an increased frequency of cranial NTDs among both +/+ and ct/ct embryos (* indicates significant difference compared to SD, p < 0.001). Inclusion of folic acid in the diet (FD+DF) reduced the incidence of cranial NTDs (# significant difference compared to FD, p < 0.001), whereas removal of antibiotic (FD+BF) had a lesser, nonsignificant effect. The frequency of cranial NTDs appeared lower in embryos following maternal supplementation with folic acid (FD+FA) or myo-inositol (FD+MI), although only the protective effect of myo-inositol in +/+ embryos was statistically significant (# compared to FD, p < 0.02). Number of embryos in which cranial neural tube closure was assessed, in order of x-axis group: +/+ = 102, 48, 17, 15, 17, 26; ct/ct = 126, 92, 36, 23, 23, 22.