Literature DB >> 19823974

The development of a cancer genetic-specific measure of coping: the GRACE.

C Phelps1, P Bennett, H Jones, K Hood, K Brain, A Murray.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Generic measures of coping fail to capture the process of undergoing specific health processes such as cancer genetic risk assessment. The Genetic Risk Assessment Coping Evaluation (GRACE) has been developed to provide greater specificity of measurement.
METHOD: Based upon previous research findings, the GRACE measures the degree of stress associated with 11 recognised sources of stress for individuals undergoing the early stages of cancer genetic risk assessment, and the use of up to eight coping strategies they may elicit. This paper reports preliminary data from the piloting of the GRACE within a randomised trial of a coping intervention.
RESULTS: Of the 265 participants who completed and returned their baseline questionnaire (prior to being informed of their level of genetic risk), 257 completed the GRACE. The most highly endorsed sources of stress involved concerns relating to family members, endorsed by over 60% of respondents, and concerns about how the participants would cope if found to be at increased risk (59%). Participants made use of multiple coping strategies across different sources of stress. The most frequently reported coping strategies were emotion-focused, which may reflect the stage of the assessment process.
CONCLUSION: The completion rates for the matrix and specificity of responses provided suggest that the GRACE may be an acceptable measurement tool. Further data collection and validation is ongoing. (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19823974     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  6 in total

1.  Psychological distress related to BRCA testing in ovarian cancer patients.

Authors:  Merete Bjørnslett; Alv A Dahl; Øystein Sørebø; Anne Dørum
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  A new approach to assessing affect and the emotional implications of personal genomic testing for common disease risk.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Kenneth P Tercyak; Chanza Baytop; Sharon Hensley Alford; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 3.  Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer S Hilgart; Bernadette Coles; Rachel Iredale
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-02-15

4.  Prognostic Factors for Distress After Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer.

Authors:  Jan S Voorwinden; Jan P C Jaspers
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Prevalence and detection of psychosocial problems in cancer genetic counseling.

Authors:  W Eijzenga; E M A Bleiker; D E E Hahn; L E Van der Kolk; G N Sidharta; N K Aaronson
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Patient-Centered Care in Breast Cancer Genetic Clinics.

Authors:  Anne Brédart; Amélie Anota; Julia Dick; Violetta Kuboth; Olivier Lareyre; Antoine De Pauw; Alejandra Cano; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Rita Schmutzler; Sylvie Dolbeault; Jean-Luc Kop
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.