Literature DB >> 19823915

Molecular characterization and expression pattern of two general odorant binding proteins from the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella.

Zhi-Chun Zhang1, Man-Qun Wang, Yao-Bin Lu, Guoan Zhang.   

Abstract

In the Lepidoptera, odorant signals are thought to be mediated by general odorant binding proteins (GOBPs) in the sensillar lymph surrounding the olfactory receptors. We describe the identification and characterization of two new cDNAs encoding GOBPs from the antennae of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), a species for which no GOBPs have been identified to date. We focused our investigation on this olfactory protein family by using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction strategies. The deduced amino acid sequences of PxylGOBP1 and PxylGOBP2 revealed open reading frames of 168 and 163 amino acids, respectively, with six cysteine residues in conserved positions relative to other known GOBPs. The alignment of the mature PxylGOBPs with other Lepidoptera GOBPs showed high sequence identity (70-80%) with other full-length sequences from GenBank. Sequence identity between PxylGOBP1and PxylGOBP2 was only 50%, suggesting that the two proteins belong to different classes of lepidopteran GOBPs. The expression patterns of the two PxylGOBP genes, with respect to tissue distribution and sex, were further investigated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and real-time PCR. Although the two GOBP genes were expressed only in the antennae of both sexes, reflecting the antennal specificity of GOBPs, the transcription levels of these genes depended on the sex, the age, the mating status, and the genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19823915     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-009-9697-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  36 in total

1.  Odorant-binding-protein subfamilies associate with distinct classes of olfactory receptor neurons in insects.

Authors:  R G Vogt; G D Prestwich; M R Lerner
Journal:  J Neurobiol       Date:  1991-01

2.  Molecular cloning and bacterial expression of a general odorant-binding protein from the cabbage armyworm Mamestra brassicae.

Authors:  M Maibèche-Coisne; S Longhi; E Jacquin-Joly; C Brunel; M P Egloff; L Gastinel; C Cambillau; M Tegoni; P Nagnan-Le Meillour
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1998-12-01

3.  Three pheromone-binding proteins in olfactory sensilla of the two silkmoth species Antheraea polyphemus and Antheraea pernyi.

Authors:  R Maida; J Krieger; T Gebauer; U Lange; G Ziegelberger
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  2000-05

4.  Expression and characterization of a lepidopteran general odorant binding protein.

Authors:  L Feng; G D Prestwich
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.714

5.  Characterization of the general odorant-binding protein 2 in the molecular coding of odorants in Mamestra brassicae.

Authors:  E Jacquin-Joly; J Bohbot; M C Francois; A H Cain; P Nagnan-Le Meillour
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  2000-11

6.  Drosophila OBP LUSH is required for activity of pheromone-sensitive neurons.

Authors:  Pingxi Xu; Rachel Atkinson; David N M Jones; Dean P Smith
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Olfaction in the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar: effect of pH, ionic strength, and reductants on pheromone transport by pheromone-binding proteins.

Authors:  A Kowcun; N Honson; E Plettner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Structural analysis and disulfide-bridge pairing of two odorant-binding proteins from Bombyx mori.

Authors:  A Scaloni; M Monti; S Angeli; P Pelosi
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1999-12-20       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Members of a family of Drosophila putative odorant-binding proteins are expressed in different subsets of olfactory hairs.

Authors:  C W Pikielny; G Hasan; F Rouyer; M Rosbash
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Pheromone binding and inactivation by moth antennae.

Authors:  R G Vogt; L M Riddiford
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981 Sep 10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  6 in total

1.  General guidelines for authors for submission of manuscripts that contain molecular biological content.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Functional analysis of general odorant binding protein 2 from the meadow moth, Loxostege sticticalis L. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).

Authors:  Jiao Yin; Honglin Feng; Hongyan Sun; Jinghui Xi; Yazhong Cao; Kebin Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Application of Cydia pomonella expressed sequence tags: Identification and expression of three general odorant binding proteins in codling moth.

Authors:  Stephen F Garczynski; Brad S Coates; Thomas R Unruh; Scott Schaeffer; Derick Jiwan; Tyson Koepke; Amit Dhingra
Journal:  Insect Sci       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.262

4.  Identification of Host-Plant Volatiles and Characterization of Two Novel General Odorant-Binding Proteins from the Legume Pod Borer, Maruca vitrata Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Crambidae).

Authors:  Jing Zhou; Na Zhang; Pan Wang; Shichang Zhang; Daiqin Li; Kaiyu Liu; Guoxiu Wang; Xiaoping Wang; Hui Ai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Identification of Genes Involved in Chemoreception in Plutella xyllostella by Antennal Transcriptome Analysis.

Authors:  Shiyong Yang; Depan Cao; Guirong Wang; Yang Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Sex pheromone recognition and characterization of three pheromone-binding proteins in the legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Crambidae).

Authors:  Aping Mao; Jing Zhou; Ya Zheng; Yufeng Wang; Daiqin Li; Pan Wang; Kaiyu Liu; Xiaoping Wang; Hui Ai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.