Literature DB >> 19823881

A fast protein-ligand docking algorithm based on hydrogen bond matching and surface shape complementarity.

Wenjia Luo1, Jianfeng Pei, Yushan Zhu.   

Abstract

With the rapid development of structural determination of target proteins for human diseases, high throughout virtual screening based drug discovery is gaining popularity gradually. In this paper, a fast docking algorithm (H-DOCK) based on hydrogen bond matching and surface shape complementarity was developed. In H-DOCK, firstly a divide-and-conquer strategy based enumeration approach is applied to rank the intermolecular modes between protein and ligand by maximizing their hydrogen bonds matching, then each docked conformation of the ligand is calculated according to the matched hydrogen bonding geometry, finally a simple but effective scoring function reflecting mainly the van der Waals interaction is used to evaluate the docked conformations of the ligand. H-DOCK is tested for rigid ligand docking and flexible one, the latter is implemented by repeating rigid docking for multiple conformations of a small molecule and ranking all together. For rigid ligands, H-DOCK was tested on a set of 271 complexes where there is at least one intermolecular hydrogen bond, and H-DOCK achieved success rate (RMSD<2.0 A) of 91.1%. For flexible ligands, H-DOCK was tested on another set of 93 complexes, where each case was a conformation ensemble containing native ligand conformation as well as 100 decoy ones generated by AutoDock, and the success rate reached 81.7%. The high success rate of H-DOCK indicates that the hydrogen bonding and steric hindrance can grasp the key interaction between protein and ligand. H-DOCK is quite efficient compared with the conventional docking algorithms, and it takes only about 0.14 seconds for a rigid ligand docking and about 8.25 seconds for a flexible one on average. According to the preliminary docking results, it implies that H-DOCK can be potentially used for large scale virtual screening as a pre-filter for a more accurate but less efficient docking algorithm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19823881     DOI: 10.1007/s00894-009-0598-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Model        ISSN: 0948-5023            Impact factor:   1.810


  25 in total

1.  Evaluation of the FLEXX incremental construction algorithm for protein-ligand docking.

Authors:  B Kramer; M Rarey; T Lengauer
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-11-01

2.  Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Luhua Lai; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 3.  Molecular recognition and docking algorithms.

Authors:  Natasja Brooijmans; Irwin D Kuntz
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2003-01-28

4.  Flexible docking using Tabu search and an empirical estimate of binding affinity.

Authors:  C A Baxter; C W Murray; D E Clark; D R Westhead; M D Eldridge
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1998-11-15

5.  QXP: powerful, rapid computer algorithms for structure-based drug design.

Authors:  C McMartin; R S Bohacek
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  Hammerhead: fast, fully automated docking of flexible ligands to protein binding sites.

Authors:  W Welch; J Ruppert; A N Jain
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  1996-06

7.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking.

Authors:  G Jones; P Willett; R C Glen; A R Leach; R Taylor
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-04-04       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  FLOG: a system to select 'quasi-flexible' ligands complementary to a receptor of known three-dimensional structure.

Authors:  M D Miller; S K Kearsley; D J Underwood; R P Sheridan
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 9.  Hydrogen bonding in globular proteins.

Authors:  E N Baker; R E Hubbard
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.667

10.  Hydrogen bonding and molecular surface shape complementarity as a basis for protein docking.

Authors:  M Meyer; P Wilson; D Schomburg
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-11-22       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  8 in total

1.  A matching algorithm for catalytic residue site selection in computational enzyme design.

Authors:  Yulin Lei; Wenjia Luo; Yushan Zhu
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  A solvated ligand rotamer approach and its application in computational protein design.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Huang; Ji Yang; Yushan Zhu
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Systematic optimization model and algorithm for binding sequence selection in computational enzyme design.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Huang; Kehang Han; Yushan Zhu
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Evaluation of active designs of cephalosporin C acylase by molecular dynamics simulation and molecular docking.

Authors:  Qing Li; Xiaoqiang Huang; Yushan Zhu
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.810

5.  Computational design of enzyme-ligand binding using a combined energy function and deterministic sequence optimization algorithm.

Authors:  Ye Tian; Xiaoqiang Huang; Yushan Zhu
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  ProSelection: A Novel Algorithm to Select Proper Protein Structure Subsets for in Silico Target Identification and Drug Discovery Research.

Authors:  Nanyi Wang; Lirong Wang; Xiang-Qun Xie
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  The Human Proteome Organization Chromosome 6 Consortium: integrating chromosome-centric and biology/disease driven strategies.

Authors:  C H Borchers; J Kast; L J Foster; K W M Siu; C M Overall; T A Binkowski; W H Hildebrand; A Scherer; M Mansoor; P A Keown
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Predicting HLA class I non-permissive amino acid residues substitutions.

Authors:  T Andrew Binkowski; Susana R Marino; Andrzej Joachimiak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.