Literature DB >> 19822726

A problem with the correlation coefficient as a measure of gene expression divergence.

Vini Pereira1, David Waxman, Adam Eyre-Walker.   

Abstract

The correlation coefficient is commonly used as a measure of the divergence of gene expression profiles between different species. Here we point out a potential problem with this statistic: if measurement error is large relative to the differences in expression, the correlation coefficient will tend to show high divergence for genes that have relatively uniform levels of expression across tissues or time points. We show that genes with a conserved uniform pattern of expression have significantly higher levels of expression divergence, when measured using the correlation coefficient, than other genes, in a data set from mouse, rat, and human. We also show that the Euclidean distance yields low estimates of expression divergence for genes with a conserved uniform pattern of expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19822726      PMCID: PMC2787443          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.110247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  20 in total

1.  Divergence in the spatial pattern of gene expression between human duplicate genes.

Authors:  Kateryna D Makova; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data.

Authors:  Rafael A Irizarry; Bridget Hobbs; Francois Collin; Yasmin D Beazer-Barclay; Kristen J Antonellis; Uwe Scherf; Terence P Speed
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Applications of a rat multiple tissue gene expression data set.

Authors:  John R Walker; Andrew I Su; David W Self; John B Hogenesch; Hilmar Lapp; Rainer Maier; Daniel Hoyer; Graeme Bilbe
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Similar gene expression profiles do not imply similar tissue functions.

Authors:  Itai Yanai; Jan O Korbel; Stephanie Boue; Shannon K McWeeney; Peer Bork; Martin J Lercher
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 11.639

5.  Comparative analysis of microarray normalization procedures: effects on reverse engineering gene networks.

Authors:  Wei Keat Lim; Kai Wang; Celine Lefebvre; Andrea Califano
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Evolutionary conservation of expression profiles between human and mouse orthologous genes.

Authors:  Ben-Yang Liao; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Assessing the conservation of mammalian gene expression using high-density exon arrays.

Authors:  Yi Xing; Zhengqing Ouyang; Karen Kapur; Matthew P Scott; Wing Hung Wong
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-03-25       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Low rates of expression profile divergence in highly expressed genes and tissue-specific genes during mammalian evolution.

Authors:  Ben-Yang Liao; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  The effect of transposable element insertions on gene expression evolution in rodents.

Authors:  Vini Pereira; David Enard; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Do Alu repeats drive the evolution of the primate transcriptome?

Authors:  Araxi O Urrutia; Leandro Balladares Ocaña; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  29 in total

1.  Neofunctionalization of young duplicate genes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Raquel Assis; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Measuring gene expression divergence: the distance to keep.

Authors:  Galina Glazko; Arcady Mushegian
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 4.540

3.  Of mice and men: divergence of gene expression patterns in kidney.

Authors:  Lydie Cheval; Fabien Pierrat; Rabary Rajerison; David Piquemal; Alain Doucet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A selection index for gene expression evolution and its application to the divergence between humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Maria Warnefors; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of computational models for assessing conservation of gene expression across species.

Authors:  Yupeng Wang; Kelly R Robbins; Romdhane Rekaya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  When orthologs diverge between human and mouse.

Authors:  Walid H Gharib; Marc Robinson-Rechavi
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 11.622

7.  Toward community standards in the quest for orthologs.

Authors:  Christophe Dessimoz; Toni Gabaldón; David S Roos; Erik L L Sonnhammer; Javier Herrero
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  The ortholog conjecture is untestable by the current gene ontology but is supported by RNA sequencing data.

Authors:  Xiaoshu Chen; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Conserved expression of natural antisense transcripts in mammals.

Authors:  Maurice H T Ling; Yuguang Ban; Hongxiu Wen; San Ming Wang; Steven X Ge
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Correcting for the bias due to expression specificity improves the estimation of constrained evolution of expression between mouse and human.

Authors:  Barbara Piasecka; Marc Robinson-Rechavi; Sven Bergmann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.