| Literature DB >> 19822644 |
Takahiro Nagatake1, Satoshi Fukuyama, Dong-Young Kim, Kaoru Goda, Osamu Igarashi, Shintaro Sato, Tomonori Nochi, Hiroshi Sagara, Yoshifumi Yokota, Anton M Jetten, Tsuneyasu Kaisho, Shizuo Akira, Hitomi Mimuro, Chihiro Sasakawa, Yoshinori Fukui, Kohtaro Fujihashi, Taishin Akiyama, Jun-ichiro Inoue, Josef M Penninger, Jun Kunisawa, Hiroshi Kiyono.
Abstract
The eye is protected by the ocular immunosurveillance system. We show that tear duct-associated lymphoid tissue (TALT) is located in the mouse lacrimal sac and shares immunological characteristics with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues (MALTs), including the presence of M cells and immunocompetent cells for antigen uptake and subsequent generation of mucosal immune responses against ocularly encountered antigens and bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Initiation of TALT genesis began postnatally; it occurred even in germ-free conditions and was independent of signaling through organogenesis regulators, including inhibitor of DNA binding/differentiation 2, retinoic acid-related orphan receptor gammat, lymphotoxin (LT) alpha1beta2-LTbetaR, and lymphoid chemokines (CCL19, CCL21, and CXCL13). Thus, TALT shares immunological features with MALT but has a distinct tissue genesis mechanism and plays a key role in ocular immunity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19822644 PMCID: PMC2768868 DOI: 10.1084/jem.20091436
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Med ISSN: 0022-1007 Impact factor: 14.307
Figure 1.Postnatal development of TALT. (A–C) 10 µl of hematoxylin solution was added to the ocular surface of 8-wk-old C57BL/6 mice to visualize the tear duct (A, arrow). Coronal (B) and horizontal (C) paraffinized sections of the head were stained with HE. Arrows and arrowheads indicate TALT and NALT, respectively (n = 3 mice/group). Bars, 1 mm. (D) Paraffinized tissues of heads from D5, D7, and D10 C57BL/6 mice were examined by HE staining. Arrows indicate the site of TALT genesis (n = 5 mice/group). Bars, 100 µm. (E and F) Head tissue of C57BL/6 mice was examined by confocal microscopy with the indicated antibodies at D5, D7, and D10. Arrows indicate PNAd+ HEVs (E) and the site of TALT genesis (F). Some magnified pictures are shown in F (insets). Dashed lines indicate the edge between the TALT epithelium and tear duct lumen. These data are representative of at least three independent experiments (n = 5 mice/group). Bars, 50 µm.
Figure 2.TALT genesis is independent of microbial stimulation and organogenesis-associated molecules. Paraffin-embedded tissue sections were analyzed by HE staining for TALT development. (A) The presence of TALT in germ-free mice, as well as C57BL/6 WT mice, shows that TALT develops independently of microbial stimulation (n = 3 mice/group). (B) Development of TALT in 8-wk-old Ltα−/−, aly/aly, Il-7rα−/−, Cxcl13−/−, plt/plt, Cxcl13, Id2−/−, and Rorγt−/− mice shows that the initiation of TALT development occurs independently of organogenesis-associated molecules. Arrows indicate the presence of TALT. These data are representative of at least three independent experiments per group (n = 5 mice/group). Bars, 100 µm.
Figure 3.Presence of CD3 (A) Because substantial numbers of CD3−CD4+CD45+ cells were noted in the TALT anlagen of D10 mice, we analyzed mononuclear cells from D10 tear ducts by FACS. Percentages of CD3−CD4+CD45+ cells are shown in red (n = 6 mice/group). (B) Confocal microscopic analysis of the site of TALT genesis at D10. Frozen tissue samples were stained with the antibodies indicated. Arrows point to CD3−CD4+ cells (n = 6 mice/group). Dotted lines indicate the edge between the TALT epithelium and tear duct lumen. Bars, 50 µm. (C) CD3−CD4+CD45+ cells from PP and TALT were isolated from an E17 intestine and D10 tear duct, respectively. Gene expression of Id2 and Rorγt were analyzed by RT-PCR. The expression of Gapdh is shown as an internal control. These data are representative of at least three independent experiments (n = 18–20 mice/group).
Figure 4.Microarchitecture of TALT. (A–C) The epithelial region of TALT in WT mice was analyzed by HE staining. B and C are magnifications, respectively, of the white and black boxes in A, and show TALT-FAE (B) and the lacrimal sac epithelium (C). The inset in B shows single-layered squamous epithelium in the TALT FAE (n = 3 mice/group). (D) The presence of goblet cells in NALT-FAE is indicated by arrows (n = 3 mice). (E–J) Confocal microscopic analysis of TALT (E–I) and NALT (J) in C57BL/6 WT mice. Tissue samples were stained with the antibodies indicated. F is a magnified view of the box in E; arrows point to the presence of CD11c+ DCs. Arrows in I and J indicate PNAd+ HEVs. These data are representative of at least three independent experiments (n = 3 mice/group). Bars, 50 µm.
Figure 5.TALT is the site of ocular antigen uptake. (A) A confocal micrograph of TALT shows the presence of NKM16-2-4+ UEA-1+ M cells (arrows; n = 3 mice). Bar, 20 µm. (B and C) TALT-FAE was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (B) and transmission electron microscopy (C). White and red arrows indicate M cells with the unique characteristics of microvilli and pocket lymphocytes, respectively (n = 5 mice/group). Bars, 3 µm. (D and E) Mice were given GFP-expressing Salmonella by eye drops. After 30 min, TALT was isolated and examined with confocal microscopy. Arrows in D and E point, respectively, to Salmonella captured by UEA-1+ M cells and CD11c+ DCs in TALT (n = 3 mice/group). Bars, 10 µm. (F) Mice were given P. aeruginosa PAO-1 by eye drops. After 30 min, TALT was isolated and examined with confocal microscopy. A large number of P. aeruginosa PAO-1 were found inside the TALT (n = 3 mice). Bar, 10 µm. (G) As a negative control for F, TALT from mice given PBS by eye drops were analyzed (n = 3 mice). Bar, 50 µm. (H) Mice were given P. aeruginosa PAO-1 by eye drops twice at an interval of 1 wk. 1 wk after the second administration, TALT was isolated and examined with confocal microscopy. GC formation was induced by ocular administration of P. aeruginosa PAO-1 (n = 3 mice). Bar, 50 µm. (I) TALT from a control naive mouse is shown. GCs did not form in naive TALT. These data are representative of at least two independent experiments per group (n = 3 mice). Bar, 50 µm.
Figure 6.Induction of antigen-specific IgA responses through TALT. (A and B) Naive mice do not form GCs (n = 3 mice). (C and D) Mice were given CT by eye drops three times at 1-wk intervals. 1 wk after the last administration, TALT was isolated and examined with confocal microscopy. The CT challenge induced GC formation in TALT (C and D) and NALT (E and F; n = 3 mice/group). Tissues were stained with PNA (A, C, and E) or for FDCs (B, D, and F). (G and H) AID expression in TALT (G) and NALT (H) was detected in mice ocularly immunized with CT (n = 3 mice/group). (I) RT-PCR analysis of Aid expression in TALT, NALT, and NPs of mice given ocular CT (n = 3 mice/group). (J and K) Distribution of IgA+B220− plasma cells in tear ducts was examined with confocal microscopy. K is a magnified view of the box in J. CT challenge by eye drops induced the appearance of a large number of plasma cells in the tear duct compartment (n = 3 mice/group). (L–N) ELISPOT analysis for the detection of CT-B–specific IgA-producing cells in tear ducts (L) and CT-B–specific IgG-producing cells in spleens (M). Data obtained from control naive mice are shown in N. These data are representative of at least two independent experiments (n = 4 mice/group). Bars, 50 µm.
Figure 7.Induction of antigen-specific CD4 (A and B) FACS analysis of CT-B tetramer–positive cells in lymphocytes isolated from TALT, NALT, and draining LNs (DLNs; cervical and submandibular LNs) of CT-immunized or naive mice. Data from TCRβ+ (A) and CD4+ (B) populations are shown. TALT preferentially responded to ocular administration of CT and generated CT-B–specific CD4+ T cells, including CXCR5+ T follicular helper cells. These data are representative of at least two independent experiments (n = 4 mice/group).
Distinct molecular features for organogenesis of different MALTs
| Mice | TALT | NALT | PP | CLN | MLN | ILF | Cryptopatch | References |
| +++ | − | − | − | − | ND | ND | *1 | |
| +++ | +++ | − | − | − | − | +/− | *2 | |
| + | + | − | − | +/− | − | +/− | *3 | |
| + | + | − | − | − | − | ++ | *4 | |
| ++ | ++ | − | +/− | ++ | ++ | − | *5 | |
| ++ | + | +/− | +/− | ++ | ND | ND | *6 | |
| +++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ND | ND | *7 | |
| + | + | +/− | − | ++ | ND | ND | *8 |
CLN, cervical LN; MLN, mesenteric LN. +++, developed well; ++, developed with decreased number of lymphocytes; +, developed with few number of lymphocytes; −, absent; +/−, present or absent, depends on individual. *1, Yokota et al., 1999; Fukuyama et al., 2002; Boos et al., 2007; *2, Sun et al., 2000; Harmsen et al., 2002; Eberl and Littman, 2004; Eberl et al., 2004; Naito et al., 2008; Tsuji et al., 2008; *3, De Togni et al., 1994; Banks et al., 1995; Suzuki et al., 2000; Fukuyama et al., 2002; Hamada et al., 2002; Harmsen et al., 2002; Taylor et al., 2004; *4, Kanamori et al., 1996; Shinkura et al., 1999; Fukuyama et al., 2002; Hamada et al., 2002; *5, Peschon et al., 1994; Kanamori et al., 1996; Adachi et al., 1998b; Fukuyama et al., 2002; Hamada et al., 2002; Luther et al., 2003; *6, Ansel et al., 2000; Rangel-Moreno et al., 2005; Fukuyama et al., 2006; *7, Nakano et al., 1997; Rangel-Moreno et al., 2005; Fukuyama et al., 2006; and *8, Luther et al., 2003; Rangel-Moreno et al., 2005; Fukuyama et al., 2006.