| Literature DB >> 19822528 |
Michael G Ho1, Shaojun Ma, Wanxing Chai, Wan Xia, Gonghuan Yang, Thomas E Novotny.
Abstract
METHODS: A survey of 11 095 urban and rural women attending high school or college, aged 14-24 years, in 6 Chinese provinces was conducted. Ever-smoking (ES), current smoking, established smoking and intention to smoke frequencies were calculated. Bivariate analyses were conducted to identify possible correlates of smoking, and those found to be significant at the p=0.1 level were included in a multivariate logistical regression model to obtain adjusted OR for correlates of ES.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19822528 PMCID: PMC2921253 DOI: 10.1136/tc.2009.030981
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Tob Control ISSN: 0964-4563 Impact factor: 7.552
Level of tobacco epidemic (scored from 1–4) among women in Chinese provinces, 1996
| Quartile level of tobacco epidemic among females | Current smoking prevalence among women, % | No. of provinces |
| 1 | 10.01 to 15.5 | 2 |
| 2 | 6.01 to 10.00 | 4 |
| 3 | 3.01 to 6.00 | 14 |
| 4 | 0.4 to 3.00 | 11 |
Target provinces, estimated school units and level of smoking among young women in selected Chinese provinces, 2008
| Province name/Capital city | Metropolitan population (urban/rural), millions | Estimated no. of high schools at metropolitan area | Estimated no. of colleges at capital city | Level of tobacco epidemic among females | Geographical location |
| Beijing/Beijing | 7.8/3.4 | 791 | 91 | 2 | North |
| Jilin/Changchun | 3.1/4.5 | 389 | 28 | 2 | Northeast |
| Sichuan/Chongqing | 15.4/63.3 | 154 | 20 | 3 | Southeast |
| Guangdong/Guangzhou | 23.9/51.8 | 190 | 46 | 3 | South |
| Gansu/Lanzhou | 3.2/7.4 | 229 | 14 | 4 | Northwest |
| Jiangxi/Nanchang | 9.8/32.3 | 200 | 14 | 3 | East |
Sample demographics (%), RFS and UFS, China, June 2008
| Total | RFS | UFS | |
| Sample size | 11095 | 4920 | 6175 |
| Mean age ± SD | 18.3 ±2.7 | 18.3±3.4 | 18.3±1.9 |
| Response rate (%) | 94.9 | 95.0 | 94.8 |
| Province/city (%) | |||
| Beijing | 16.0 | 14.8 | 16.9 |
| Changchun | 17.5 | 17.3 | 17.6 |
| Chongqing | 17.0 | 22.0 | 13.1 |
| Guangzhou | 16.5 | 10.5 | 21.3 |
| Lanzhou | 16.7 | 19.1 | 14.9 |
| Nanchang | 16.3 | 16.3 | 16.2 |
| School classification (%) | |||
| Vocational/technical HS | 22.0 | 28.8 | 16.6 |
| Regular HS | 22.4 | 25.4 | 20.1 |
| Key point HS | 23.0 | 19.3 | 25.9 |
| University | 32.6 | 26.5 | 37.4 |
| Self-reported school performance (%) | |||
| Very good | 1.7 | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| Good | 22.7 | 20.8 | 24.2 |
| Fair | 67.5 | 69.6 | 65.8 |
| Poor | 7.2 | 7.5 | 7.1 |
| Very poor | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Ethnicity (%) | |||
| Han Chinese | 95.2 | 96.4 | 94.3 |
| Other (ie, minority) | 4.6 | 3.4 | 5.6 |
| Between 0–$7 | 17.9 | 21.3 | 15.1 |
| Between $8–$14 | 19.5 | 22.7 | 17.1 |
| Between $15–$29 | 23.2 | 25.0 | 21.7 |
| Between $30–$58 | 21.7 | 20.1 | 22.9 |
| Between $59–$117 | 13.1 | 9.3 | 16.3 |
| Over $118 | 4.1 | 0.9 | 6.0 |
Pocket money spent per month by respondents was converted to US$ based on the conversion 6.8%RMB=US$1%at the time of analysis.
HS, high school; RFS, rural female students; UFS, urban female students.
Smoking behaviour, attitudes, knowledge, health risk knowledge (%) among RFS and UFS, China, 2008
| Total | RFS | UFS | p Values | |
| Sample size | N=11095 | N=4920 | N=6175 | |
| Smoking behaviour (%) | ||||
| Ever-smoker | 20.1% | 19.0% | 22.0% | <0.01 |
| Mean age first puff | 12.7±4.3 years | 12.3±4.3 years | 13.0±4.3 years | |
| Established smoking | 1.7% | 0.9% | 2.4% | <0.01 |
| Current smoking | 3.2% | 1.9% | 4.2% | <0.01 |
| Intention to smoke | 2.7% | 1.7% | 3.5% | <0.01 |
| Never-smoker | 79.3% | 81.0% | 78.0% | <0.01 |
| Smoking environment (%) | ||||
| Father smokes | 72.0% | 75.7% | 69.1% | <0.01 |
| Mother smokes | 4.4% | 4.4% | 4.4% | =0.96 |
| Teacher smokes | 37.3% | 41.8% | 33.7% | <0.01 |
| Attitude towards female smokers (%) | ||||
| Appears cool | 8.4% | 7.5% | 9.1% | <0.01 |
| Appears independent | 19.3% | 17.9% | 20.3% | <0.01 |
| Appears charismatic | 7.5% | 5.8% | 8.9% | <0.01 |
| Knowledge regarding CMFW (%) | ||||
| Heard of CMFW | 68.6% | 61.3% | 74.5% | <0.01 |
| Seen CMFW | 45.2% | 34.2% | 54.0% | <0.01 |
| Tried CMFW | 7.2% | 4.1% | 9.6% | <0.01 |
| Health risk knowledge (%) | ||||
| Believe smoking is very harmful | 86.8% | 87.8% | 86.0% | =0.09 |
| Believe smoking increases risk of CV disease | 65.1% | 62.2% | 67.5% | <0.01 |
| Believe smoking increases risk of lung cancer | 95.7% | 94.5% | 96.6% | <0.01 |
| Believe smoking increases risk of hepatitis | 69.3% | 71.2% | 67.7% | <0.01 |
| Obtain smoke health risk information via (%) | ||||
| Parents | 53.0% | 51.5% | 54.2% | <0.01 |
| Doctor | 49.7% | 49.7% | 49.7% | =0.97 |
| Television | 76.7% | 74.2% | 78.7% | <0.01 |
| Internet | 55.0% | 49.6% | 59.4% | <0.01 |
| Knowledge and attitudes towards China anti-tobacco policies (%) | ||||
| Knowledge of anti-minor tobacco sale law | 70.9% | 69.6% | 72.0% | <0.01 |
| Support of anti-minor tobacco sale law | 72.6% | 74.1% | 71.5% | <0.01 |
| Support of anti-tobacco advertisement law | 58.2% | 61.6% | 55.5% | <0.01 |
by χ2 test.
CMFW, cigarettes made for women; CV, cardiovascular; RFS, rural female students; UFS, urban female students.
Figure 1Ever-smoking rates by rural and urban school classification, China 2008.
Correlates of ES among young Chinese women attending schools in 6 provinces, 2008 (n=11095)
| Correlate | p Value | OR |
| Region | ||
| Urban | <0.01 | 0.84 (0.75 to 0.94) |
| Rural | 1.00 | |
| Pocket money monthly (To nearest US$) (%) | ||
| Above $14 | <0.01 | 1.35 (1.20 to 1.51) |
| Between 0–$14 | 1.00 | |
| Self-reported school performance | ||
| Very poor, poor | 0.01 | 1.50 (1.20 to 1.80) |
| Very good, good, fair | 1.00 | |
| Friend smokes | ||
| Yes | <0.01 | 1.73 (1.53 to 1.95) |
| No | 1.00 | |
| Boyfriend smokes | ||
| Yes | <0.01 | 1.63 (1.40 to 1.90) |
| Other (no, not applicable) | 1.00 | |
| Parents reaction to smoking | ||
| Other (indifferent, happy, I don't know) | <0.01 | 1.63 (1.41 to 1.90) |
| Angry | 1.00 | |
| Attitude towards female smoking | ||
| Other | <0.01 | 0.87 (0.80 to 1.00) |
| Seems to lack self-confidence | 1.00 | |
| CMFW knowledge, attitudes, beliefs | ||
| Seen or heard of CMFW | ||
| Yes | <0.01 | 1.66 (1.49 to 1.86) |
| No | 1.00 | |
| Think CMFW taste better | ||
| Yes | 0.23 | 1.10 (0.93 to 1.31) |
| Don't know | <0.01 | 0.52 (0.44 to 0.62) |
| No | 1.00 | |
| Think CMFW less harmful to health | ||
| Yes | <0.01 | 1.54 (1.33 to 1.79) |
| Don't know | <0.01 | 1.31 (1.14 to 1.52) |
| No | 1.00 | |
| Low refusal self-efficacy | ||
| Yes | <0.01 | 6.35 (5.32 to 7.57) |
| No | 1.00 | |
| Believe smoking is very harmful | ||
| Yes | 0.04 | 0.42 (0.22 to 0.84) |
| Other | 1.00 | |
| Attitude towards antismoking laws | ||
| Support restricted sales to minors | 0.57 | 1.02 (0.89 to 1.16) |
| Indifferent to restricted sales to minors | <0.01 | 1.61 (1.30 to 2.01) |
| Oppose restricted sales to minors | 1.00 | |
Bivariate analysis, by χ2 test.
Based on multivariate logistic analysis.
Low refusal self-efficacy=subject would smoke a cigarette if offered by best friend.
CMFW, cigarettes made for women; ES, ever-smoking.