Literature DB >> 19822487

Computed tomography in diagnosing vascular invasion in pancreatic and periampullary cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wen-Yi Zhao1, Meng Luo, Yong-Wei Sun, Qing Xu, Wei Chen, Gang Zhao, Zhi-Yong Wu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative diagnosis of local vascular invasion is very important to the selection of therapeutic protocols and prediction of the prognosis of pancreatic and periampullary cancers. This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing vascular invasion in patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancers. DATA SOURCES: English-language articles reporting diagnostic accuracy of CT for vascular invasion in pancreatic and periampullary cancers were searched from the MEDLINE and PubMed databases. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios.
RESULTS: Data were extracted from 18 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CT in diagnosing vascular invasion were 77% and 81%. Since CT technology improved in different periods, in the recent five years (2004-2008) CT has shown a higher diagnostic accuracy, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity increased to 85% and 82%, respectively. Subgroup analysis of CT studies was made to determine the involvement of different vessels, and the pooled sensitivities for the invasion of the venous system, portal vein, and arterial system were 75%, 75%, and 68%, and the pooled specificities were 84%, 91%, and 92%, respectively. For CT imaging with vascular reconstruction, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 84% and 85%, higher than the estimates in studies without reconstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: Developed CT technology with vascular reconstruction is used as an imaging modality for diagnosing vascular invasion at present. Further combined application of various imaging modalities may improve the accuracy of diagnosis, especially for smaller vessel involvement, such as the superior mesenteric vein or artery, which are difficult to demarcate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19822487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int


  18 in total

1.  A tumour score with multidetector spiral CT for venous infiltration in pancreatic cancer: influence on borderline resectable.

Authors:  Tiziana Marinelli; Antonella Filippone; Francesca Tavano; Andrea Fontana; Fabio Pellegrini; Jörg Köninger; Götz M Richter; Lorenzo Bonomo; Markus W Büchler; Pierluigi di Sebastiano; Francesco F di Mola
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Effect of pretreatment psoas muscle mass on survival for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer undergoing systemic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Noriko Ishii; Yoshinori Iwata; Hiroki Nishikawa; Hirayuki Enomoto; Nobuhiro Aizawa; Akio Ishii; Yuho Miyamoto; Yukihisa Yuri; Kunihiro Hasegawa; Chikage Nakano; Takashi Nishimura; Kazunori Yoh; Yoshiyuki Sakai; Naoto Ikeda; Tomoyuki Takashima; Ryo Takata; Hiroko Iijima; Shuhei Nishiguchi
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 3.  Robotic-assisted spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy: a technical review.

Authors:  Yen-Yi Juo; Jonathan C King
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-10-10

4.  Pancreatic endocrine tumors with major vascular abutment, involvement, or encasement and indication for resection.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Norton; Edmund J Harris; Yijun Chen; Brendan C Visser; George A Poultsides; Pamela C Kunz; George A Fisher; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-06

5.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Outstanding problems.

Authors:  Olga P Zakharova; Grigory G Karmazanovsky; Viacheslav I Egorov
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-05-27

6.  Surgery for pancreatic carcinoma: state of the art.

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande; Savio George Barreto
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 0.656

7.  Preoperative imaging for resectable periampullary cancer: clinicopathologic implications of reported radiographic findings.

Authors:  Zhi Ven Fong; Wei Phin Tan; Harish Lavu; Eugene P Kennedy; Donald G Mitchell; Leonidas G Koniaris; Patricia K Sauter; Ernest L Rosato; Charles J Yeo; Jordan M Winter
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Imaging diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Eun Sun Lee; Jeong Min Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Multimodality imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande; Savio George Barreto; Mahesh Goel; Supreeta Arya
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  Preoperative prediction of curative surgery of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma by combination of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography.

Authors:  Sara Kammerer; Tobias Meister; Heiner Wolters; Matthias Lessing; Anna Hüsing; Dirk Domagk; Martin Floer; Christian Wilms; Hartmut Schmidt; Norbert Senninger; Gabriele Köhler; Hauke Sebastian Heinzow
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.