Literature DB >> 19822273

Antipseudomonal activity of piperacillin/tazobactam: more than a decade of experience from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997-2007).

Ronald N Jones1, Matthew G Stilwell, Paul R Rhomberg, Helio S Sader.   

Abstract

We evaluated the susceptibility rates for piperacillin/tazobactam tested against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from the Asia-Pacific (APAC), Europe (EU), Latin America (LA), and North America (NA) for 1997 to 2007. A total of 25 460 isolates were tested originating from APAC (4441), EU (7695), LA (4277), and NA (9047). All testing was performed by reference broth microdilution methods. The samples were collected from >110 medical centers and samples averaging >30 nations/year. For this analysis, results from 1997 to 2007, 1997 to 1999, 2005 to 2007, APAC, EU, LA, and NA were assessed against several broad-spectrum beta-lactams, including cefepime, ceftazidime, imipenem, meropenem, and piperacillin alone, for a total of 12 agents overall. Using P. aeruginosa breakpoints (< or =64 microg/mL), piperacillin/tazobactam had the broadest coverage (% susceptible) in 2 regions (EU, LA) and, overall, at 83.6% followed by meropenem (83.0%) > imipenem (79.7%) > piperacillin (79.5%) > cefepime (77.5%) > ceftazidime (75.8%). Other non-beta-lactam activity results were ciprofloxacin at only 71.5% susceptible, but tobramycin and polymyxin B had higher susceptibility rates (81.0% and 99.5%, respectively). Trends toward piperacillin/tazobactam resistance were noted between 1997 to 1999 and 2000 to 2007 in APAC (-11.6% susceptibility), NA (-4.0%), and EU (-2.3%). LA susceptibility rates were lowest overall but actually increased recently by +2.9% (current rate, 79.4% susceptible). For beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, susceptibility rates were higher for piperacillin/tazobactam when compared in all regions with piperacillin alone (+2.6-7.1%) and greatest for LA isolates. In contrast, ticarcillin/clavulanate susceptibility rates were lower than ticarcillin tested alone in NA (-1.5%, antagonism), and this agent only inhibited 70.3% of isolates worldwide. In conclusion, piperacillin/tazobactam remained a very active beta-lactam when tested in vitro against clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa found in the SENTRY Program (1997-2007). Trends toward slightly decreased susceptibility were noted in all regions over the last decade (except LA); only polymyxins had susceptibility rates at >90%. Resistance surveillance programs should be sustained to document emerging resistance patterns of old and newer agents for difficult-to-treat pathogens such as P. aeruginosa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19822273     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.06.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  10 in total

1.  Prospective evaluating the appropriate use of piperacillin /tazobactam in cardiac center of a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Sanaa Saeed Mekdad; Leenah AlSayed
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 1.637

2.  Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on Antimicrobial Utilization, Bacterial Susceptibilities, and Financial Expenditures at an Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Tristan T Timbrook; John M Hurst; John A Bosso
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2016-10

3.  Reducing Virulence and Biofilm of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by Potential Quorum Sensing Inhibitor Carotenoid: Zeaxanthin.

Authors:  Barış Gökalsın; Busecan Aksoydan; Burak Erman; Nüzhet Cenk Sesal
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Does the piperacillin minimum inhibitory concentration for Pseudomonas aeruginosa influence clinical outcomes of children with pseudomonal bacteremia?

Authors:  Pranita D Tamma; Alison E Turnbull; Aaron M Milstone; Alice J Hsu; Karen C Carroll; Sara E Cosgrove
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Lichen secondary metabolite evernic acid as potential quorum sensing inhibitor against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Barış Gökalsın; Nüzhet Cenk Sesal
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Effects of Chlorine Stress on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm and Analysis of Related Gene Expressions.

Authors:  Özge Kekeç; Barış Gökalsın; İskender Karaltı; Figen Esin Kayhan; Nüzhet Cenk Sesal
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa: resistance to the max.

Authors:  Keith Poole
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Variability of Beta-Lactam Broth Microdilution for Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  A A Bhalodi; N Oppermann; S A Campeau; R M Humphries
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Surveillance on secular trends of incidence and mortality for device-associated infection in the intensive care unit setting at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan, 2000-2008: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Yin-Yin Chen; Liang-Yu Chen; Seng-Yi Lin; Pesus Chou; Shu-Yuan Liao; Fu-Der Wang
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 10.  Interaction of antibacterial compounds with RND efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Jürg Dreier; Paolo Ruggerone
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.