Elling Bere1, Line A Bjørkelund. 1. Faculty of Health and Sport, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway. elling.bere@uia.no.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies assessing active commuting to school usually use simple questionnaires, and often is mode of commuting reported with a single questionnaire item only. The purpose of the present study is to report the test-retest reliability of a newly developed comprehensive questionnaire on active commuting to school and work among 6th grade school children and their parents in Norway. METHODS: A total of 106 pupils and 77 parents completed a questionnaire two times, 14 days apart. The questionnaire consisted of frequency items on how often the participants walk, cycle, go by car and go by public transportation to school (pupils) or work (parents). The questionnaire was divided into seasons and to/from school or work in order to cover seasonal and topographic variations. The average number of trips for each mode of commuting was calculated. Then the sample was categorised into mode of commuting: walkers, cyclists, car commuters or public transport commuters. RESULTS: The average numbers of trips did not differ for any of the commuting modes comparing test to retest data for any of the seasons. Test-retest correlation coefficients were high for all modes of commuting (Spearman correlation coefficient were 0.85-0.92 for pupils and 0.82-0.95 for parents). Most participants categorised into mode of commuting were categorized into the same mode at both time points (97% and 95% for pupils and parents respectively). CONCLUSION: This newly developed questionnaire appears to be a reliable tool for measuring active commuting to school and work.
BACKGROUND: Studies assessing active commuting to school usually use simple questionnaires, and often is mode of commuting reported with a single questionnaire item only. The purpose of the present study is to report the test-retest reliability of a newly developed comprehensive questionnaire on active commuting to school and work among 6th grade school children and their parents in Norway. METHODS: A total of 106 pupils and 77 parents completed a questionnaire two times, 14 days apart. The questionnaire consisted of frequency items on how often the participants walk, cycle, go by car and go by public transportation to school (pupils) or work (parents). The questionnaire was divided into seasons and to/from school or work in order to cover seasonal and topographic variations. The average number of trips for each mode of commuting was calculated. Then the sample was categorised into mode of commuting: walkers, cyclists, car commuters or public transport commuters. RESULTS: The average numbers of trips did not differ for any of the commuting modes comparing test to retest data for any of the seasons. Test-retest correlation coefficients were high for all modes of commuting (Spearman correlation coefficient were 0.85-0.92 for pupils and 0.82-0.95 for parents). Most participants categorised into mode of commuting were categorized into the same mode at both time points (97% and 95% for pupils and parents respectively). CONCLUSION: This newly developed questionnaire appears to be a reliable tool for measuring active commuting to school and work.
Authors: Richard Larouche; Adewale L Oyeyemi; Antonio Prista; Vincent Onywera; Kingsley K Akinroye; Mark S Tremblay Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2014-10-18 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Richard Larouche; Jean-Philippe Chaput; Geneviève Leduc; Charles Boyer; Priscilla Bélanger; Allana G LeBlanc; Michael M Borghese; Mark S Tremblay Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Lisan M Hidding; Mai J M Chinapaw; Mireille N M van Poppel; Lidwine B Mokkink; Teatske M Altenburg Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 11.136