Literature DB >> 19821427

Single dose oral fenbufen for acute postoperative pain in adults.

R Andrew Moore1, Sheena Derry, Henry J McQuay.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fenbufen is a non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), used to treat acute and chronic painful conditions. There is no known systematic review of its use in acute postoperative pain.
OBJECTIVES: To assess efficacy, duration of action, and associated adverse events of single dose oral fenbufen in acute postoperative pain in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Oxford Pain Relief database for studies to June 2009. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trials of single dose orally administered fenbufen in adults with moderate to severe acute postoperative pain. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Pain relief or pain intensity data were extracted and converted into the dichotomous outcome of number of participants with at least 50% pain relief over 4 to 6 hours, from which relative risk and number needed to treat to benefit (NNT) were calculated. Numbers of participants using rescue medication over specified time periods, and time to use of rescue medication, were sought as additional measures of efficacy. Information on adverse events and withdrawals were collected. MAIN
RESULTS: Searches identified only one study with (90 participants in total, 31 taking fenbufen). The study compared oral fenbufen 800 mg, fenbufen 400 mg, and placebo in participants with established postoperative pain. Fenbufen at both doses had apparent analgesic efficacy, but the numbers of participants was too small to allow sensible analysis. Gastrointestinal adverse events were noted in 4 of 15 participants taking fenbufen 800 mg. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of evidence of efficacy for oral fenbufen in acute postoperative pain, its use in this indication is not justified at present. Because trials clearly demonstrating analgesic efficacy in the most basic of acute pain studies is lacking, use in other indications should be evaluated carefully. Given the large number of available drugs of this and similar classes which are effective, there is no urgent research agenda for this particular drug.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19821427      PMCID: PMC4175557          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007547.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  35 in total

1.  Analgesic value of fenbufen in postoperative patients. A comparative oral analgesic study of fenbufen, aspirin, and placebo.

Authors:  A Sunshine
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1975 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 2.  The coxibs, selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2.

Authors:  G A FitzGerald; C Patrono
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-08-09       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Seeking a simple measure of analgesia for mega-trials: is a single global assessment good enough?

Authors:  S L Collins; J Edwards; R A Moore; L A Smith; H J McQuay
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  [Clinical evaluation of fenbufen in the treatment of postoperative inflammation in oral surgery].

Authors:  K Nishida; M Suzuki; F Saigusa; Y Agari; T Satoh; Y Hisano
Journal:  Shigaku       Date:  1986-06

5.  A double-blind comparative study of the analgesic effects of fenbufen, codeine, aspirin, propoxyphene and placebo.

Authors:  A Coutinho; J Bonelli; P C de Carvalho
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  1976-01

6.  Analgesic efficacy and safety of Fenbufen following surgical removal of a lower wisdom tooth: a comparison with acetylsalicylic acid and placebo.

Authors:  P A Henrikson; A Tjernberg; U Ahlström; L E Peterson
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 7.  Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory analgesics other than salicylates.

Authors:  R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 8.  Relative efficacy of oral analgesics after third molar extraction.

Authors:  J Barden; J E Edwards; H J McQuay; P J Wiffen; R A Moore
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2004-10-09       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 9.  Fenbufen: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in rheumatic diseases and acute pain.

Authors:  R N Brogden; R C Heel; T M Speight; G S Avery
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 10.  Pharmacologic properties of fenbufen.

Authors:  S S Kerwar
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-10-31       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Adverse events associated with single dose oral analgesics for acute postoperative pain in adults - an overview of Cochrane reviews.

Authors:  R Andrew Moore; Sheena Derry; Dominic Aldington; Philip J Wiffen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-10-13

Review 2.  Clinical pharmacology of analgesics assessed with human experimental pain models: bridging basic and clinical research.

Authors:  Bruno Georg Oertel; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Single dose oral analgesics for acute postoperative pain in adults.

Authors:  R Andrew Moore; Sheena Derry; Henry J McQuay; Philip J Wiffen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-09-07

Review 4.  Single dose oral analgesics for acute postoperative pain in adults - an overview of Cochrane reviews.

Authors:  R Andrew Moore; Sheena Derry; Dominic Aldington; Philip J Wiffen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-28

Review 5.  Non-prescription (OTC) oral analgesics for acute pain - an overview of Cochrane reviews.

Authors:  R Andrew Moore; Philip J Wiffen; Sheena Derry; Terry Maguire; Yvonne M Roy; Laila Tyrrell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.