BACKGROUND: Good neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest is hard to achieve. Interventions during the resuscitation phase and treatment within the first hours after the event are critical. Experimental evidence suggests that therapeutic hypothermia is beneficial, and a number of clinical studies on this subject have been published. OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic hypothermia in patients after cardiac arrest. Neurologic outcome, survival and adverse events were our main outcome parameters. We aimed to perform individual patient data analysis if data were available, and to from subgroups according to the cardiac arrest situation. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2007 Issue 1); MEDLINE (1971 to January 2007); EMBASE (1987 to January 2007); CINAHL (1988 to January 2007); PASCAL (2000 to January 2007); and BIOSIS (1989 to January 2007). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomized controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of the therapeutic hypothermia in patients after cardiac arrest without language restrictions. Studies were restricted to adult populations cooled with any cooling method applied within six hours of cardiac arrest. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Validity measures, the intervention, outcome parameters and additional baseline variables were entered into the database. Meta-analysis was only done for a subset of comparable studies with negligible heterogeneity. For these studies individual patient data were available. MAIN RESULTS: Four trials and one abstract reporting on 481 patients were included in the systematic review. Quality of the included studies was good in three out of five included studies. For the three comparable studies on conventional cooling methods all authors provided individual patient data. With conventional cooling methods patients in the hypothermia group were more likely to reach a best cerebral performance categories score of one or two (CPC, five point scale; 1= good cerebral performance, to 5 = brain death) during hospital stay (individual patient data; RR, 1.55; 95% CI 1.22 to 1.96) and were more likely to survive to hospital discharge (individual patient data; RR, 1.35; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.65) compared to standard post-resuscitation care. Across all studies there was no significant difference in reported adverse events between hypothermia and control. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Conventional cooling methods to induce mild therapeutic hypothermia seem to improve survival and neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. Our review supports the current best medical practice as recommended by the International Resuscitation Guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Good neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest is hard to achieve. Interventions during the resuscitation phase and treatment within the first hours after the event are critical. Experimental evidence suggests that therapeutic hypothermia is beneficial, and a number of clinical studies on this subject have been published. OBJECTIVES: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic hypothermia in patients after cardiac arrest. Neurologic outcome, survival and adverse events were our main outcome parameters. We aimed to perform individual patient data analysis if data were available, and to from subgroups according to the cardiac arrest situation. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2007 Issue 1); MEDLINE (1971 to January 2007); EMBASE (1987 to January 2007); CINAHL (1988 to January 2007); PASCAL (2000 to January 2007); and BIOSIS (1989 to January 2007). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomized controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of the therapeutic hypothermia in patients after cardiac arrest without language restrictions. Studies were restricted to adult populations cooled with any cooling method applied within six hours of cardiac arrest. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Validity measures, the intervention, outcome parameters and additional baseline variables were entered into the database. Meta-analysis was only done for a subset of comparable studies with negligible heterogeneity. For these studies individual patient data were available. MAIN RESULTS: Four trials and one abstract reporting on 481 patients were included in the systematic review. Quality of the included studies was good in three out of five included studies. For the three comparable studies on conventional cooling methods all authors provided individual patient data. With conventional cooling methods patients in the hypothermia group were more likely to reach a best cerebral performance categories score of one or two (CPC, five point scale; 1= good cerebral performance, to 5 = brain death) during hospital stay (individual patient data; RR, 1.55; 95% CI 1.22 to 1.96) and were more likely to survive to hospital discharge (individual patient data; RR, 1.35; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.65) compared to standard post-resuscitation care. Across all studies there was no significant difference in reported adverse events between hypothermia and control. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Conventional cooling methods to induce mild therapeutic hypothermia seem to improve survival and neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. Our review supports the current best medical practice as recommended by the International Resuscitation Guidelines.
Authors: Hjalmar R Bouma; Frans G M Kroese; Jan Willem Kok; Fatimeh Talaei; Ate S Boerema; Annika Herwig; Oana Draghiciu; Azuwerus van Buiten; Anne H Epema; Annie van Dam; Arjen M Strijkstra; Robert H Henning Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-01-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Michael P Robich; Robert Hagberg; Marc L Schermerhorn; Frank B Pomposelli; Michael C Nilson; Michelle L Gendron; Frank W Sellke; Roberto Rodriguez Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2012-03-02 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Inge G Revsbech; Xinggui Shen; Ritu Chakravarti; Frank B Jensen; Bonnie Thiel; Alina L Evans; Jonas Kindberg; Ole Fröbert; Dennis J Stuehr; Christopher G Kevil; Angela Fago Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 7.376