Literature DB >> 19821294

Premedication for anxiety in adult day surgery.

Kevin J Walker1, Andrew F Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the early 1980s, it has become more and more common to carry out surgical procedures on a day case basis. Many patients are anxious before surgery yet there is sometimes a reluctance to provide sedative medication because it is believed to delay discharge from hospital.This is an updated version of the review first published in 2000 (previous updates 2003; 2006).
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of anxiolytic premedication on time to discharge in adult patients undergoing day case surgery under general anaesthesia. SEARCH STRATEGY: We identified trials by computerized searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2009 Issue 1 ); MEDLINE (1980 to January 2009); EMBASE (1980 to January 2009). We also checked the reference lists of trials and review articles and handsearched three main anaesthesia journals. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all identified randomized controlled trials comparing anxiolytic drug(s) with placebo before general anaesthesia in adult day case surgical patients. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We collected data on anaesthetic drugs used; results of psychomotor function tests where these were used to assess residual effect of premedication; and on times from end of anaesthesia to ability to walk unaided or readiness for discharge from hospital. Formal statistical synthesis of individual trials was not performed in view of the variety of drugs studied. MAIN
RESULTS: We included 17 studies. Methodological quality of included studies was poor. Of these 17, only seven studies specifically addressed the discharge question; none found any delay in premedicated patients. Two other studies used clinical criteria to assess fitness for discharge, though times were not given. Again, there was no difference from placebo. Eleven studies used tests of psychomotor function with or without clinical measures as indicators of recovery from anaesthesia. In none of these studies did the premedication appear to delay discharge, although performance on tests of psychomotor function was sometimes still impaired. Three studies showed no impairment in psychomotor function, six showed some impairment which had resolved by three hours or time of discharge and two showed significant impairment. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of a difference in time to discharge from hospital, assessed by clinical criteria, in patients who received anxiolytic premedication. However, in view of the age and variety of anaesthetic techniques used and clinical heterogeneity between studies, inferences for current day case practice should be made with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19821294      PMCID: PMC7098461          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002192.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  49 in total

1.  An evaluation of tests of psychomotor function in assessing recovery following a brief anaesthetic.

Authors:  J N Cashman; S J Power
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.105

2.  Comparison of recovery after halothane or alfentanil anaesthesia for minor surgery.

Authors:  E Moss; I Hindmarch; A J Pain; R S Edmondson
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Effect of metoprolol and diazepam on pre-operative anxiety.

Authors:  C J Jakobsen; L Blom; M Brondbjerg; P Lenler-Petersen
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  A re-evaluation of the anxiolytic properties of intramuscular midazolam.

Authors:  A A Artru; M S Dhamee; A B Seifen; B Wright
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.669

5.  Double-blind comparison of midazolam and temazepam as oral premedicants for outpatient anaesthesia.

Authors:  T G Short; D C Galletly
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 1.669

6.  A comparison of oral midazolam solution with temazepam as a day case premedicant.

Authors:  G A Turner; M Paech
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 1.669

7.  Premedication with midazolam in out-patient general anaesthesia. A comparison with morphine-scopolamine and placebo.

Authors:  J C Raeder; H Breivik
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.105

8.  Evaluation of oral midazolam as pre-medication in day care surgery in adult Pakistani patients.

Authors:  N Ahmed; F A Khan
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 0.781

9.  Effects of age and gender on intravenous midazolam premedication: a randomized double-blind study.

Authors:  G-C Sun; M-C Hsu; Y-Y Chia; P-Y Chen; F-Z Shaw
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Preoperative intravenous midazolam: benefits beyond anxiolysis.

Authors:  Kevin P Bauer; Patrick M Dom; Antonio M Ramirez; Jennifer E O'Flaherty
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.452

View more
  32 in total

1.  Is current perioperative practice in hepatic surgery based on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) principles?

Authors:  E M Wong-Lun-Hing; R M van Dam; L A Heijnen; O R C Busch; T Terkivatan; R van Hillegersberg; G D Slooter; J Klaase; J H W de Wilt; K Bosscha; U P Neumann; B Topal; L A Aldrighetti; C H C Dejong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Anesthesia and fast-track in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS): from evidence to practice.

Authors:  Marzia Umari; Stefano Falini; Matteo Segat; Michele Zuliani; Marco Crisman; Lucia Comuzzi; Francesco Pagos; Stefano Lovadina; Umberto Lucangelo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Enhanced recovery programmes for patients undergoing radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Julian Smith; Raj S Pruthi; John McGrath
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 4.  Enhanced recovery protocols (ERP) in robotic cystectomy surgery. Review of current status and trends.

Authors:  Christofer Adding; Justin W Collins; Oscar Laurin; Abolfazl Hosseini; N Peter Wiklund
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Canadian consensus statement: enhanced recovery after surgery in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Jerry T Dang; Vivian G Szeto; Ahmad Elnahas; James Ellsmere; Allan Okrainec; Amy Neville; Samaad Malik; Ekua Yorke; Dennis Hong; Laurent Biertho; Timothy Jackson; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  Donald E Low; William Allum; Giovanni De Manzoni; Lorenzo Ferri; Arul Immanuel; MadhanKumar Kuppusamy; Simon Law; Mats Lindblad; Nick Maynard; Joseph Neal; C S Pramesh; Mike Scott; B Mark Smithers; Valérie Addor; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.

Authors:  Kristoffer Lassen; Marielle M E Coolsen; Karem Slim; Francesco Carli; José E de Aguilar-Nascimento; Markus Schäfer; Rowan W Parks; Kenneth C H Fearon; Dileep N Lobo; Nicolas Demartines; Marco Braga; Olle Ljungqvist; Cornelis H C Dejong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Short-term outcomes of laparoscopy combined with enhanced recovery pathway after ileocecal resection for Crohn's disease: a case-matched analysis.

Authors:  Antonino Spinelli; Piero Bazzi; Matteo Sacchi; Silvio Danese; Gionata Fiorino; Alberto Malesci; Lorenzo Gentilini; Gilberto Poggioli; Marco Montorsi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations.

Authors:  U O Gustafsson; M J Scott; W Schwenk; N Demartines; D Roulin; N Francis; C E McNaught; J Macfie; A S Liberman; M Soop; A Hill; R H Kennedy; D N Lobo; K Fearon; O Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations.

Authors:  J Nygren; J Thacker; F Carli; K C H Fearon; S Norderval; D N Lobo; O Ljungqvist; M Soop; J Ramirez
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.