Literature DB >> 19821266

Oral contraceptive pill for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Cindy Farquhar1, Julie Brown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Menorrhagia (heavy menstrual bleeding) is a benign yet debilitating social and health condition. Treatments prescribed in order to reduce excessive menstrual blood loss include prostaglandin synthetase inhibitors, antifibrinolytics, the oral contraceptive pill and other hormones. The combined oral contraceptive pill (OCP) is claimed to have a variety of beneficial, inducing a regular shedding of a thinner endometrium and inhibiting ovulation thus having the effect of treating menorrhagia and providing contraception.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of oral contraceptive pills compared with other medical therapies, placebo or no therapy in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register (search dates: Oct 1996, May 2002, June 2004, April 2006 and June 2009) for all publications which describe randomised trials of OCP for the treatment of menorrhagia. This register is based on regular searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, the hand searching of 20 relevant journals and conference proceedings, and searches of several key grey literature sources. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled comparisons of OCP versus other medical therapies, placebo or no treatment for the treatment of menorrhagia. Women of reproductive years with regular heavy periods, measured either objectively or subjectively and greater than, or equal to, two months follow up. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All assessments of trial quality and data extraction were performed unblinded by at least two reviewers. Only one trial of 45 women met the inclusion criteria and none were excluded. MAIN
RESULTS: As the trial used a cross-over design, only data from the first treatment period (cycles three and four) were analysed. The results from all the three mefenamic acid groups were combined. There was no significant difference in menstrual blood loss (MBL) between those women treated with the OCP and danazol, mefenamic acid or naproxen. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: One small study found no significant difference between groups treated with OCP, mefenamic acid, low dose danazol or naproxen. Overall, the evidence from the one study is not sufficient to adequately assess the effectiveness of OCP.This review was unable to achieve its stated objectives because of the paucity of the data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19821266     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000154.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  13 in total

1.  Practice patterns and attitudes about treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a national survey of obstetricians and gynecologists.

Authors:  Kristen A Matteson; Britta L Anderson; Stephanie B Pinto; Vrishali Lopes; Jay Schulkin; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Non-surgical interventions for treating heavy menstrual bleeding (menorrhagia) in women with bleeding disorders.

Authors:  Sujoy Ray; Amita Ray
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-10

3.  Open-access transvaginal sonography in women of reproductive age with abnormal vaginal bleeding: a descriptive study in general practice.

Authors:  Corlien J H de Vries; Margreet Wieringa-de Waard; Patrick J E Bindels; Willem M Ankum
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Combined hormonal contraceptives for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Anne Lethaby; Michelle R Wise; Maria Aj Weterings; Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez; Julie Brown
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-11

5.  Heavy menstrual flow: current and future trends in management.

Authors:  Yusuf Beebeejaun; Rajesh Varma
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013

Review 6.  Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Jane Marjoribanks; Anne Lethaby; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-29

7.  Hormonal anticonception anno 2013: a clinician's view.

Authors:  M Dhont; V Verhaeghe
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2013

8.  Satisfaction and health-related quality of life in women with heavy menstrual bleeding; results from a non-interventional trial of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or conventional medical therapy.

Authors:  Ling Xu; Byung Seok Lee; Shaheena Asif; Peter Kraemer; Pirjo Inki
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-05-27

9.  Knowledge of Latin American Obstetricians and Gynecologists regarding Heavy Menstrual Bleeding.

Authors:  Luis Bahamondes; Victor Marin; Silvia Ciarmatori; Agnaldo L Silva-Filho; Juan Manuel Acuña; Maria Y Makuch
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2016-08-25

10.  Use of mixed-treatment-comparison methods in estimating efficacy of treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  David C Hoaglin; Anna Filonenko; Mark E Glickman; Radek Wasiak; Risha Gidwani
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.175

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.