Literature DB >> 19820902

Computation of 3D queries for ROCS based virtual screens.

Gregory J Tawa1, J Christian Baber, Christine Humblet.   

Abstract

Rapid overlay of chemical structures (ROCS) is a method that aligns molecules based on shape and/or chemical similarity. It is often used in 3D ligand-based virtual screening. Given a query consisting of a single conformation of an active molecule ROCS can generate highly enriched hit lists. Typically the chosen query conformation is a minimum energy structure. Can better enrichment be obtained using conformations other than the minimum energy structure? To answer this question a methodology has been developed called CORAL (COnformational analysis, Rocs ALignment). For a given set of molecule conformations it computes optimized conformations for ROCS screening. It does so by clustering all conformations of a chosen molecule set using pairwise ROCS combo scores. The best representative conformation is that which has the highest average overlap with the rest of the conformations in the cluster. It is these best representative conformations that are then used for virtual screening. CORAL was tested by performing virtual screening experiments with the 40 DUD (Directory of Useful Decoys) data sets. Both CORAL and minimum energy queries were used. The recognition capability of each query was quantified as the area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results show that the CORAL AUC values are on average larger than the minimum energy AUC values. This demonstrates that one can indeed obtain better ROCS enrichments with conformations other than the minimum energy structure. As a result, CORAL analysis can be a valuable first step in virtual screening workflows using ROCS.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19820902     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-009-9302-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  26 in total

1.  Assessing the performance of OMEGA with respect to retrieving bioactive conformations.

Authors:  Jonas Boström; Jeremy R Greenwood; Johan Gottfries
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.518

2.  Virtual screening workflow development guided by the "receiver operating characteristic" curve approach. Application to high-throughput docking on metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 4.

Authors:  Nicolas Triballeau; Francine Acher; Isabelle Brabet; Jean-Philippe Pin; Hugues-Olivier Bertrand
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Conformation mining: an algorithm for finding biologically relevant conformations.

Authors:  Santosh Putta; Gregory A Landrum; Julie E Penzotti
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Molecular shape and electrostatics in the encoding of relevant chemical information.

Authors:  Anthony Nicholls; J Andrew Grant
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools.

Authors:  Paul C D Hawkins; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 7.446

6.  2D QSAR and similarity studies on cruzain inhibitors aimed at improving selectivity over cathepsin L.

Authors:  Renato F Freitas; Tudor I Oprea; Carlos A Montanari
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  High-resolution crystal structure of an engineered human beta2-adrenergic G protein-coupled receptor.

Authors:  Vadim Cherezov; Daniel M Rosenbaum; Michael A Hanson; Søren G F Rasmussen; Foon Sun Thian; Tong Sun Kobilka; Hee-Jung Choi; Peter Kuhn; William I Weis; Brian K Kobilka; Raymond C Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  How to optimize shape-based virtual screening: choosing the right query and including chemical information.

Authors:  Johannes Kirchmair; Simona Distinto; Patrick Markt; Daniela Schuster; Gudrun M Spitzer; Klaus R Liedl; Gerhard Wolber
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 9.  How to do an evaluation: pitfalls and traps.

Authors:  Paul C D Hawkins; Gregory L Warren; A Geoffrey Skillman; Anthony Nicholls
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  The 2.6 angstrom crystal structure of a human A2A adenosine receptor bound to an antagonist.

Authors:  Veli-Pekka Jaakola; Mark T Griffith; Michael A Hanson; Vadim Cherezov; Ellen Y T Chien; J Robert Lane; Adriaan P Ijzerman; Raymond C Stevens
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cis-isomerism and other chemical requirements of steroidal agonists and partial agonists acting at TRPM3 channels.

Authors:  Y Majeed; A K Agarwal; J Naylor; V A L Seymour; S Jiang; K Muraki; C W G Fishwick; D J Beech
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Comprehensive structural and functional characterization of the human kinome by protein structure modeling and ligand virtual screening.

Authors:  Michal Brylinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 4.956

3.  BCL::MolAlign: Three-Dimensional Small Molecule Alignment for Pharmacophore Mapping.

Authors:  Benjamin P Brown; Jeffrey Mendenhall; Jens Meiler
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 4.956

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.