Literature DB >> 19820578

Reaming does not add significant time to intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal fractures of the tibia and femur.

Brett D Crist1, Philip R Wolinsky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reamed intramedullary nailing is the current gold standard for the treatment of diaphyseal fractures of the femur and tibia. Current concepts of orthopedic damage control surgery for patients with multiple injuries have placed an emphasis on appropriate surgical timing, limiting blood loss, and the duration of the initial operative procedure(s). Proponents of unreamed nailing have stated that reaming places polytraumatized patients "at risk," in part because it adds to the length of the surgical procedure and may exacerbate the severity of a patient's pulmonary injury. The purpose of this study was to determine how many minutes reaming actually takes and what percentage of operative time reaming comprises during intramedullary nailing of femoral and tibial shaft fractures.
METHODS: Intraoperative timing data were collected prospectively on a total of 52 patients with 54 fractures (21 femoral and 33 tibial) who underwent reamed intramedullary nailing of acute closed or open femoral or tibial shaft fractures over a 10-month period. Total operating room, surgical, and reaming times were collected.
RESULTS: The average reaming time for femur and tibia fractures was 6.9 minutes and 7 minutes, respectively. On average, reaming accounted for 4.9% of the surgical time and 3.2% of the total operating room time for femur fractures and 4.9% of the surgical time and 3.4% of the total operating room for tibia fractures.
CONCLUSION: Our results show that reaming comprises a small percentage of the operative time and the total time a patient spends in the operating room.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19820578     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31819db55c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  7 in total

1.  Factors affecting the closed reduction of diaphyseal fractures of the femur.

Authors:  Ahmet Ozgur Yildirim; Ozdamar Fuad Oken; Yusuf Alper Katı; Murat Gulcek; Ahmet Ucaner
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-10-16

2.  Radiologic Outcomes of Intramedullary Nailing in Infraisthmal Femur-Shaft Fracture with or without Poller Screws.

Authors:  Sang-Heon Song
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Does Virtual Reality Improve Procedural Completion and Accuracy in an Intramedullary Tibial Nail Procedure? A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Mark D Orland; Michael J Patetta; Michael Wieser; Erdan Kayupov; Mark H Gonzalez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Clinical outcome of ream versus unream intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Farshid Bagheri; Seyed Reza Sharifi; Navid Reza Mirzadeh; Alireza Hootkani; Mohamad Hosein Ebrahimzadeh; Hami Ashraf
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 0.611

5.  Is there a place for open intramedullary nailing in femoral shaft fractures?

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Tahririan; Ali Andalib
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2014-07-31

6.  Reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of femoral fractures: A meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  A-Bing Li; Wei-Jiang Zhang; Wei-Jun Guo; Xin-Hua Wang; Hai-Ming Jin; You-Ming Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Does Open Reduction in Intramedullary Nailing of Femur Shaft Fractures Adversely Affect the Outcome? A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Syed Imran Ghouri; Abduljabbar Alhammoud; Mohammed Mubarak Alkhayarin
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2020-05-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.