Literature DB >> 1981993

Sex, strain, and species differences affect recombination across an evolutionarily conserved segment of mouse chromosome 16.

R H Reeves1, M R Crowley, B F O'Hara, J D Gearhart.   

Abstract

A region of substantial genetic homology exists between human chromosome 21 (HSA21) and mouse chromosome 16 (MMU16). Analysis of 520 backcross animals has been used to establish gene order in the homologous segment. D21S16h and Mx are shown to represent the known proximal and distal limits of homology between the chromosomes, while Gap43, whose human homolog is on HSA3, is the next proximal marker on MMU16 that has been mapped in the human genome. Recombination frequencies (RFs) in four intervals defined by five loci in the HSA21-homologous region of MMU16 were analyzed in up to 895 progeny of eight different backcrosses. Two of the eight crosses were made with F1 males and six with F1 females. The average RF of 0.249 in 265 backcross progeny of F1 males was significantly higher than the 0.106 average recombination in 320 progeny of F1 females in the interval from D21S16h to Ets-2. This is in contrast to HSA21, which shows higher RFs in female meiosis in the corresponding region. Considerable variation in RF was observed between crosses involving different strains, both in absolute and in relative sizes of the intervals measured. The highest RFs occurred in a cross between the laboratory strain C57BL/6 and MOLD/Rk, an inbred strain derived from Mus musculus molossinus. RFs on this cross were nearly fivefold higher than those reported previously for an interspecific cross between C57BL/6 and Mus spretus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 1981993     DOI: 10.1016/0888-7543(90)90236-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genomics        ISSN: 0888-7543            Impact factor:   5.736


  40 in total

1.  Perfect conserved linkage across the entire mouse chromosome 10 region homologous to human chromosome 21.

Authors:  T Wiltshire; M Pletcher; S E Cole; M Villanueva; B Birren; J Lehoczky; K Dewar; R H Reeves
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 2.  Comparative map for mice and humans.

Authors:  J H Nadeau; M T Davisson; D P Doolittle; P Grant; A L Hillyard; M R Kosowsky; T H Roderick
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 3.  Mouse chromosome 16.

Authors:  R H Reeves; R D Miller
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Evolution of the genomic recombination rate in murid rodents.

Authors:  Beth L Dumont; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Linkage analysis of 84 microsatellite markers in intra- and interspecific backcrosses.

Authors:  M A McAleer; T J Aitman; R J Cornall; S Ghosh; J R Hall; C M Hearne; J M Love; J B Prins; S Ramachandran; N Rodrigues
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 6.  Mouse map of paralogous genes.

Authors:  J H Nadeau; M Kosowsky
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 7.  Mouse chromosome 16.

Authors:  R H Reeves; R D Miller; R Riblet
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 8.  Comparative map for mice and humans.

Authors:  J H Nadeau; M T Davisson; D P Doolittle; P Grant; A L Hillyard; M Kosowsky; T H Roderick
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.957

9.  Variation in meiotic recombination frequencies among human males.

Authors:  Fei Sun; Kiril Trpkov; Alfred Rademaker; Evelyn Ko; Renée H Martin
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Genetic control of mammalian meiotic recombination. I. Variation in exchange frequencies among males from inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Kara E Koehler; Jonathan P Cherry; Audrey Lynn; Patricia A Hunt; Terry J Hassold
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.