I M Carr1, J I Robinson, R Dimitriou, A F Markham, A W Morgan, D T Bonthron. 1. Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, Wellcome Trust Brenner Building, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK. msjimc@leeds.ac.uk
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Determination of the relative copy number of single-nucleotide sequence variants (SNVs) within a DNA sample is a frequent experimental goal. Various methods can be applied to this problem, although hybridization-based approaches tend to suffer from high-setup cost and poor adaptability, while others (such as pyrosequencing) may not be accessible to all laboratories. The potential to extract relative copy number information from standard dye-terminator electropherograms has been little explored, yet this technology is cheap and widely accessible. Since several biologically important loci have paralogous copies that interfere with genotyping, and which may also display copy number variation (CNV), there are many situations in which determination of the relative copy number of SNVs is desirable. RESULTS: We have developed a desktop application, QSVanalyzer, which allows high-throughput quantification of the proportions of DNA sequences containing SNVs. In reconstruction experiments, QSVanalyzer accurately estimated the known relative proportions of SNVs. By analyzing a large panel of genomic DNA samples, we demonstrate the ability of the software to analyze not only common biallelic SNVs, but also SNVs within a locus at which gene conversion between four genomic paralogs operates, and within another that is subject to CNV. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: QSVanalyzer is freely available at http://dna.leeds.ac.uk/qsv/. It requires the Microsoft .NET framework version 2.0, which can be installed on all Microsoft operating systems from Windows 98 onwards. CONTACT: msjimc@leeds.ac.uk SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: Determination of the relative copy number of single-nucleotide sequence variants (SNVs) within a DNA sample is a frequent experimental goal. Various methods can be applied to this problem, although hybridization-based approaches tend to suffer from high-setup cost and poor adaptability, while others (such as pyrosequencing) may not be accessible to all laboratories. The potential to extract relative copy number information from standard dye-terminator electropherograms has been little explored, yet this technology is cheap and widely accessible. Since several biologically important loci have paralogous copies that interfere with genotyping, and which may also display copy number variation (CNV), there are many situations in which determination of the relative copy number of SNVs is desirable. RESULTS: We have developed a desktop application, QSVanalyzer, which allows high-throughput quantification of the proportions of DNA sequences containing SNVs. In reconstruction experiments, QSVanalyzer accurately estimated the known relative proportions of SNVs. By analyzing a large panel of genomic DNA samples, we demonstrate the ability of the software to analyze not only common biallelic SNVs, but also SNVs within a locus at which gene conversion between four genomic paralogs operates, and within another that is subject to CNV. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: QSVanalyzer is freely available at http://dna.leeds.ac.uk/qsv/. It requires the Microsoft .NET framework version 2.0, which can be installed on all Microsoft operating systems from Windows 98 onwards. CONTACT: msjimc@leeds.ac.uk SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Kavita Gandhi; Mahamadou A Thera; Drissa Coulibaly; Karim Traoré; Ando B Guindo; Ogobara K Doumbo; Shannon Takala-Harrison; Christopher V Plowe Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Carsten Riether; Thomas Pabst; Sabine Höpner; Ulrike Bacher; Magdalena Hinterbrandner; Yara Banz; Rouven Müller; Markus G Manz; Walid H Gharib; David Francisco; Remy Bruggmann; Luc van Rompaey; Mahan Moshir; Tim Delahaye; Domenica Gandini; Ellen Erzeel; Anna Hultberg; Samson Fung; Hans de Haard; Nicolas Leupin; Adrian F Ochsenbein Journal: Nat Med Date: 2020-06-29 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Alfonso Santos-Lopez; Cristina Bernabe-Balas; Manuel Ares-Arroyo; Rafael Ortega-Huedo; Andreas Hoefer; Alvaro San Millan; Bruno Gonzalez-Zorn Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Alex Rosenberg; Madeline R Luth; Elizabeth A Winzeler; Michael Behnke; L David Sibley Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yana G Kamberov; Elinor K Karlsson; Gerda L Kamberova; Daniel E Lieberman; Pardis C Sabeti; Bruce A Morgan; Clifford J Tabin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-07-20 Impact factor: 11.205