Literature DB >> 19819740

Pulse pressure strongly predicts cardiovascular disease risk in patients with type 2 diabetes from the Swedish National Diabetes Register (NDR).

P M Nilsson1, J Cederholm, K Eeg-Olofsson, B Eliasson, B Zethelius, S Gudbjörnsdóttir.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze pulse pressure (PP) as a risk predictor for coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke and cardiovascular disease (CVD; CHD and/or stroke) in type 2 diabetic patients.
METHODS: A total of 11,128 female and male type 2 diabetic patients with known baseline PP values and no CVD, aged 50-74 years, were followed for a mean duration of 5.6 years (1998-2003). A subgroup of 5521 patients with known mean PP values (mean values at baseline and at the end of the study) was also included.
RESULTS: Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CI for fatal/nonfatal CHD with baseline or mean PP>or=75mmHg, compared to <75mmHg, were 1.23 (1.07-1.40; P=0.003) and 1.32 (1.07-1.62; P=0.009), respectively, after adjusting for mean blood pressure (MBP), age, gender, diabetes duration, HbA(1c), body mass index (BMI), lipid-reducing drugs, microalbuminuria > 20microg/min, antihypertensive drugs and hypoglycaemic treatment, using Cox regression analyses. Fully-adjusted respective HRs for stroke were 1.17 (0.98-1.39) and 1.21 (0.90-1.61) and, for CVD, 1.23 (1.10-1.37; P<0.001) and 1.28 (1.07-1.52; P=0.007). Fully-adjusted HRs for baseline PP increased per quartile and, CHD, stroke or CVD, were 1.09 (1.03-1.16; P=0.004), 1.14 (1.05-1.23; P=0.002) and 1.11 (1.05-1.17; P<0.001), respectively. The data suggest that, if a mean PP>or=75mmHg were to be avoided, then 15% and 17% of CHD and or CVD, cases, respectively, in such a cohort might be prevented after multivariable adjustments, with a further 10% of cases avoided if also adjusted for MBP and age. Increasing baseline MBP, age and microalbuminuria were independently and significantly associated (P<0.001) with increasing baseline or mean PP.
CONCLUSION: Increased PP is a powerful independent risk predictor of CVD in type 2 diabetic patients, and lowering PP can lead to a marked reduction in risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19819740     DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2009.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab        ISSN: 1262-3636            Impact factor:   6.041


  12 in total

1.  Pulsatile stress in middle-aged patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes compared with nondiabetic control subjects.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Philips; Monique Marchand; André J Scheen
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 17.152

2.  Reservoir-Excess Pressure Parameters Independently Predict Cardiovascular Events in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Kunihiko Aizawa; Francesco Casanova; Phillip E Gates; David M Mawson; Kim M Gooding; W David Strain; Gerd Östling; Jan Nilsson; Faisel Khan; Helen M Colhoun; Carlo Palombo; Kim H Parker; Angela C Shore; Alun D Hughes
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Effects of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor, on blood pressure and markers of arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a post hoc analysis.

Authors:  Michael Pfeifer; Raymond R Townsend; Michael J Davies; Ujjwala Vijapurkar; Jimmy Ren
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 9.951

4.  Effects of candesartan in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on inflammatory parameters and their relationship to pulse pressure.

Authors:  Masaya Sakamoto; Hirofumi Suzuki; Takeshi Hayashi; Hiroyuki Iuchi; Tsuyoshi Isaka; Noriko Sakamoto; Yosuke Kayama; Katsuyoshi Tojo; Michihiro Yoshimura; Kazunori Utsunomiya
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 9.951

5.  Central pulse pressure and its hemodynamic determinants in middle-aged adults with impaired fasting glucose and diabetes: the Asklepios study.

Authors:  Julio A Chirinos; Patrick Segers; Thierry C Gillebert; Marc L De Buyzere; Caroline M Van Daele; Zubair A Khan; Umair Khawar; Dirk De Bacquer; Ernst R Rietzschel
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  Blood Pressure Control Has Improved in People with and without Type 2 Diabetes but Remains Suboptimal: A Longitudinal Study Based on the German DIAB-CORE Consortium.

Authors:  Ina-Maria Rückert; Jens Baumert; Michaela Schunk; Rolf Holle; Sabine Schipf; Henry Völzke; Alexander Kluttig; Karin-Halina Greiser; Teresa Tamayo; Wolfgang Rathmann; Christa Meisinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Autonomic dysfunction independently predicts poor cardiovascular outcomes in asymptomatic individuals with type 2 diabetes in the DIAD study.

Authors:  Deborah A Chyun; Frans J Th Wackers; Silvio E Inzucchi; Powell Jose; Curtis Weiss; Janice A Davey; Gary V Heller; Ami E Iskandrian; Lawrence H Young
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2015-02-24

8.  Blood pressure profile in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Rizna Abdul Cader; Halim Abdul Gafor; Rozita Mohd; Suriani Ibrahim; W H Wan Haslina; Arba'iyah Bain; Norella Ct Kong
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.068

9.  Effects of empagliflozin on blood pressure and markers of arterial stiffness and vascular resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  R Chilton; I Tikkanen; C P Cannon; S Crowe; H J Woerle; U C Broedl; O E Johansen
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 6.577

10.  Physical inactivity and cardiac events: An analysis of the Detection of Ischemia in Asymptomatic Diabetics (DIAD) study.

Authors:  Margaret M McCarthy; Frans J Th Wackers; Janice Davey; Deborah A Chyun
Journal:  J Clin Transl Endocrinol       Date:  2017-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.