Literature DB >> 19819658

Classification of Bacteria and Archaea: past, present and future.

Karl Heinz Schleifer1.   

Abstract

The late 19th century was the beginning of bacterial taxonomy and bacteria were classified on the basis of phenotypic markers. The distinction of prokaryotes and eukaryotes was introduced in the 1960s. Numerical taxonomy improved phenotypic identification but provided little information on the phylogenetic relationships of prokaryotes. Later on, chemotaxonomic and genotypic methods were widely used for a more satisfactory classification. Archaea were first classified as a separate group of prokaryotes in 1977. The current classification of Bacteria and Archaea is based on an operational-based model, the so-called polyphasic approach, comprised of phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and genotypic data, as well as phylogenetic information. The provisional status Candidatus has been established for describing uncultured prokaryotic cells for which their phylogenetic relationship has been determined and their authenticity revealed by in situ probing. The ultimate goal is to achieve a theory-based classification system based on a phylogenetic/evolutionary concept. However, there are currently two contradictory opinions about the future classification of Bacteria and Archaea. A group of mostly molecular biologists posits that the yet-unclear effect of gene flow, in particular lateral gene transfer, makes the line of descent difficult, if not impossible, to describe. However, even in the face of genomic fluidity it seems that the typical geno- and phenotypic characteristics of a taxon are still maintained, and are sufficient for reliable classification and identification of Bacteria and Archaea. There are many well-defined genotypic clusters that are congruent with known species delineated by polyphasic approaches. Comparative sequence analysis of certain core genes, including rRNA genes, may be useful for the characterization of higher taxa, whereas various character genes may be suitable as phylogenetic markers for the delineation of lower taxa. Nevertheless, there may still be a few organisms which escape a reliable classification.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19819658     DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2009.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 0723-2020            Impact factor:   4.022


  37 in total

1.  Observation of nonspherical particle behaviors for continuous shape-based separation using hydrodynamic filtration.

Authors:  Sari Sugaya; Masumi Yamada; Minoru Seki
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Clinical "Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis" Strains from Europe.

Authors:  Anna Grankvist; Edward R B Moore; Liselott Svensson Stadler; Sona Pekova; Christian Bogdan; Walter Geißdörfer; Jenny Grip-Lindén; Kenny Brandström; Jan Marsal; Kristofer Andréasson; Catharina Lewerin; Christina Welinder-Olsson; Christine Wennerås
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Characterization and Recognition of Brachyspira hampsonii sp. nov., a Novel Intestinal Spirochete That Is Pathogenic to Pigs.

Authors:  Nandita S Mirajkar; Nyree D Phillips; Tom La; David J Hampson; Connie J Gebhart
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Genomic taxonomy of the genus prochlorococcus.

Authors:  Cristiane C Thompson; Genivaldo G Z Silva; Nayra M Vieira; Robert Edwards; Ana Carolina P Vicente; Fabiano L Thompson
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 5.  The Changing Face of the Family Enterobacteriaceae (Order: "Enterobacterales"): New Members, Taxonomic Issues, Geographic Expansion, and New Diseases and Disease Syndromes.

Authors:  J Michael Janda; Sharon L Abbott
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions.

Authors:  Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Alexander F Auch; Hans-Peter Klenk; Markus Göker
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Taxonomy of bacterial fish pathogens.

Authors:  Brian Austin
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.683

8.  Toward understanding, managing, and protecting microbial ecosystems.

Authors:  Paul L E Bodelier
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  A review on gut microbiota: a central factor in the pathophysiology of obesity.

Authors:  A L Cunningham; J W Stephens; D A Harris
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Estimating variation within the genes and inferring the phylogeny of 186 sequenced diverse Escherichia coli genomes.

Authors:  Rolf S Kaas; Carsten Friis; David W Ussery; Frank M Aarestrup
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.