Literature DB >> 19819616

The suprapubic arch sling procedure for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a 5-year retrospective study.

Stefan Heidler1, Petra Ofner-Kopeinig, Erika Puchwein, Karl Pummer, Guenter Primus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Up to now, numerous similar products concerning the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) have been developed.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of the suprapubic arch (SPARC) sling system in women with SUI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a long-term retrospective study. All patients underwent a comprehensive pre- and postoperative evaluation. Forty-six women were available for clinical follow-up investigation after SPARC sling placement. INTERVENTION: Eighty-six women with SUI and a positive cough test underwent SPARC sling placement between June 2001 and January 2004. MEASUREMENTS: At follow-up all 46 patients underwent a cough test, a pad test, uroflowmetry, and sonographic postvoid residual volume measurement. Women rated their subjective continence status (continent, slightly incontinent, incontinent) and were asked if they would undergo the procedure again and if they would recommend it to a friend. Objective cure was defined as a pad weight 0-1g and a negative cough test. Subjective cure was defined as no use of pads. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median follow-up was 5.2 yr. The objective cure rate was 76%; the subjective cure rate was 52%. Sixty-three percent of the patients rated themselves as continent, 33% as slightly incontinent, and 4% as severely incontinent. Most of the women (98%) would recommend the SPARC procedure to a friend and would undergo the procedure again.
CONCLUSIONS: The SPARC sling system is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of female SUI. Patient satisfaction is independent of complete dryness.
Copyright © 2009 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19819616     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.09.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  5 in total

Review 1.  Medium-term and long-term outcomes following placement of midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Giovanni A Tommaselli; Costantino Di Carlo; Carmen Formisano; Annamaria Fabozzi; Carmine Nappi
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Clinical impact of body mass index on the outcome of the SPARC-sling system for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Badereddinn Mohamad Al-Ali; Georg C Hutterer; Erika Puchwein; Karl Pummer; Giacomo Novara; Günter Primus
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Transvaginal retropubic sling systems: efficacy and patient acceptability.

Authors:  Christina P Moldovan; Michelle E Marinone; Andrea Staack
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-02-16

4.  Long-Term Results after Suprapubic ARC Procedure for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Retrospective Data Analysis.

Authors:  Samra Jasarevic; Doroteja Jankovic; Georg C Hutterer; Regina Riedl; Georg P Pichler; Karl Pummer; Günter Primus
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Sexual function in women with stress urinary incontinence treated with the SPARC sling system.

Authors:  Badereddin Mohamad Al-Ali; Rany Shamloul; Georg C Hutterer; Erika Puchwein; Karl Pummer; Alexander Avian; Günter Primus
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.