Literature DB >> 19819004

Efficacy and safety of a modified killed-whole-cell oral cholera vaccine in India: an interim analysis of a cluster-randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Dipika Sur1, Anna Lena Lopez, Suman Kanungo, Allison Paisley, Byomkesh Manna, Mohammad Ali, Swapan K Niyogi, Jin Kyung Park, Banawarilal Sarkar, Mahesh K Puri, Deok Ryun Kim, Jacqueline L Deen, Jan Holmgren, Rodney Carbis, Raman Rao, Thu Van Nguyen, Allan Donner, Nirmal K Ganguly, G Balakrish Nair, Sujit K Bhattacharya, John D Clemens.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral cholera vaccines consisting of killed whole cells have been available for many years, but they have not been used extensively in populations with endemic disease. An inexpensive, locally produced oral killed-whole-cell vaccine has been used in high-risk areas in Vietnam. To expand the use of this vaccine, it was modified to comply with WHO standards. We assessed the efficacy and safety of this modified vaccine in a population with endemic cholera.
METHODS: In this double-blind trial, 107 774 non-pregnant residents of Kolkata, India, aged 1 year or older, were cluster-randomised by dwelling to receive two doses of either modified killed-whole-cell cholera vaccine (n=52 212; 1966 clusters) or heat-killed Escherichia coli K12 placebo (n=55 562; 1967 clusters), both delivered orally. Randomisation was done by computer-generated sequence in blocks of four. The primary endpoint was prevention of episodes of culture-confirmed Vibrio cholerae O1 diarrhoea severe enough for the patient to seek treatment in a health-care facility. We undertook an interim, per-protocol analysis at 2 years of follow-up that included individuals who received two completely ingested doses of vaccine or placebo. We assessed first episodes of cholera that occurred between 14 days and 730 days after receipt of the second dose. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00289224.
FINDINGS: 31 932 participants assigned to vaccine (1721 clusters) and 34 968 assigned to placebo (1757 clusters) received two doses of study treatment. There were 20 episodes of cholera in the vaccine group and 68 episodes in the placebo group (protective efficacy 67%; one-tailed 99% CI, lower bound 35%, p<0.0001). The vaccine protected individuals in age-groups 1.0-4.9 years, 5.0-14.9 years, and 15 years and older, and protective efficacy did not differ significantly between age-groups (p=0.28). We recorded no vaccine-related serious adverse events.
INTERPRETATION: This modified killed-whole-cell oral vaccine, compliant with WHO standards, is safe, provides protection against clinically significant cholera in an endemic setting, and can be used in children aged 1.0-4.9 years, who are at highest risk of developing cholera in endemic settings. FUNDING: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, Governments of South Korea, Sweden, and Kuwait.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19819004     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61297-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  100 in total

1.  Cholera: lessons from haiti and beyond.

Authors:  Ana A Weil; Louise C Ivers; Jason B Harris
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Memory B cell and other immune responses in children receiving two doses of an oral killed cholera vaccine compared to responses following natural cholera infection in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Daniel T Leung; Mohammad Arif Rahman; M Mohasin; Sweta M Patel; Amena Aktar; Farhana Khanam; Taher Uddin; M Asrafuzzaman Riyadh; Amit Saha; Mohammad Murshid Alam; Fahima Chowdhury; Ashraful Islam Khan; Richelle Charles; Regina LaRocque; Jason B Harris; Stephen B Calderwood; Firdausi Qadri; Edward T Ryan
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2012-03-21

Review 3.  New-generation vaccines against cholera.

Authors:  John Clemens; Sunheang Shin; Dipika Sur; G Balakrish Nair; Jan Holmgren
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  Cholera in India: an analysis of reports, 1997-2006.

Authors:  S Kanungo; B K Sah; A L Lopez; J S Sung; A M Paisley; D Sur; J D Clemens; G Balakrish Nair
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Social and cultural determinants of oral cholera vaccine uptake in Zanzibar.

Authors:  Christian Schaetti; Said M Ali; Raymond Hutubessy; Ahmed M Khatib; Claire-Lise Chaignat; Mitchell G Weiss
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Development and preclinical evaluation of a trivalent, formalin-inactivated Shigella whole-cell vaccine.

Authors:  R W Kaminski; M Wu; K R Turbyfill; K Clarkson; B Tai; A L Bourgeois; L L Van De Verg; R I Walker; E V Oaks
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2014-01-08

7.  Antigen-specific memory B-cell responses in Bangladeshi adults after one- or two-dose oral killed cholera vaccination and comparison with responses in patients with naturally acquired cholera.

Authors:  Mohammad Murshid Alam; M Asrafuzzaman Riyadh; Kaniz Fatema; Mohammad Arif Rahman; Nayeema Akhtar; Tanvir Ahmed; Mohiul Islam Chowdhury; Fahima Chowdhury; Stephen B Calderwood; Jason B Harris; Edward T Ryan; Firdausi Qadri
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2011-02-23

8.  Update on available vaccines in India: report of the APPA VU 2010: I.

Authors:  Sunil Karande
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 9.  Evaluation of vaccines against enteric infections: a clinical and public health research agenda for developing countries.

Authors:  John Clemens
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  The case for a typhoid vaccine probe study and overview of design elements.

Authors:  Bradford D Gessner; M Elizabeth Halloran; Imran Khan
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.