Literature DB >> 19818987

Comparison of molecular markers to detect fresh sewage in environmental waters.

W Ahmed1, A Goonetilleke, D Powell, K Chauhan, T Gardner.   

Abstract

Human-specific Bacteroides HF183 (HS-HF183), human-specific Enterococci faecium esp (HS-esp), human-specific adenoviruses (HS-AVs) and human-specific polyomaviruses (HS-PVs) assays were evaluated in freshwater, seawater and distilled water to detect fresh sewage. The sewage spiked water samples were also tested for the concentrations of traditional fecal indicators (i.e., Escherichia coli, enterococci and Clostridium perfringens) and enteric viruses such as enteroviruses (EVs), sapoviruses (SVs), and torquetenoviruses (TVs). The overall host-specificity of the HS-HF183 marker to differentiate between humans and other animals was 98%. However, the HS-esp, HS-AVs and HS-PVs showed 100% host-specificity. All the human-specific markers showed >97% sensitivity to detect human fecal pollution. E. coli, enterococci and, C. perfringens were detected up to dilutions of sewage 10(-5), 10(-4) and 10(-3) respectively. HS-esp, HS-AVs, HS-PVs, SVs and TVs were detected up to dilution of sewage 10(-4) whilst EVs were detected up to dilution 10(-5). The ability of the HS-HF183 marker to detect fresh sewage was 3-4 orders of magnitude higher than that of the HS-esp and viral markers. The ability to detect fresh sewage in freshwater, seawater and distilled water matrices was similar for human-specific bacterial and viral marker. Based on our data, it appears that human-specific molecular markers are sensitive measures of fresh sewage pollution, and the HS-HF183 marker appears to be the most sensitive among these markers in terms of detecting fresh sewage. However, the presence of the HS-HF183 marker in environmental waters may not necessarily indicate the presence of enteric viruses due to their high abundance in sewage compared to enteric viruses. More research is required on the persistency of these markers in environmental water samples in relation to traditional fecal indicators and enteric pathogens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19818987     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  20 in total

1.  Highly discriminatory single-nucleotide polymorphism interrogation of Escherichia coli by use of allele-specific real-time PCR and eBURST analysis.

Authors:  Maxim S Sheludchenko; Flavia Huygens; Megan H Hargreaves
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Cross-Comparison of Human Wastewater-Associated Molecular Markers in Relation to Fecal Indicator Bacteria and Enteric Viruses in Recreational Beach Waters.

Authors:  B Hughes; D J Beale; P G Dennis; S Cook; W Ahmed
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  First Detection of Human Papillomaviruses and Human Polyomaviruses in River Waters in Italy.

Authors:  M Iaconelli; S Petricca; S Della Libera; P Di Bonito; G La Rosa
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Applicability of universal Bacteroidales genetic marker for microbial monitoring of drinking water sources in comparison to conventional indicators.

Authors:  A Shahryari; M Nikaeen; M Khiadani Hajian; F Nabavi; M Hatamzadeh; A Hassanzadeh
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Tracking the primary sources of fecal pollution in a tropical watershed in a one-year study.

Authors:  Carlos Toledo-Hernandez; Hodon Ryu; Joel Gonzalez-Nieves; Evelyn Huertas; Gary A Toranzos; Jorge W Santo Domingo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Terrestrial sources homogenize bacterial water quality during rainfall in two urbanized watersheds in Santa Barbara, CA.

Authors:  Bram Sercu; Laurie C Van De Werfhorst; Jill L S Murray; Patricia A Holden
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Level of contamination in the feces of several species at major inland pollution sources in the drainage basin of Yeoja Bay, Republic of Korea.

Authors:  Sang Hyeon Jeong; Soon Bum Shin; Ji Hee Lee; Ji Young Kwon; Hee Chung Lee; Seon-Jae Kim; Kwang Soo Ha
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Presence of Torque teno virus (TTV) in tap water in public schools from Southern Brazil.

Authors:  Andréia Dalla Vecchia; Mariana Kluge; Joseane V dos Santos da Silva; Juliana Comerlato; Manoela T Rodrigues; Juliane D Fleck; Roger B da Luz; Thais F Teixeira; Paulo M Roehe; Roberta Capalonga; Ana Beatriz Oliveira; Fernando R Spilki
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 9.  Oncogenic Papillomavirus and Polyomavirus in Water Environments: Is There a Potential for Waterborne Transmission?

Authors:  M Fratini; P Di Bonito; G La Rosa
Journal:  Food Environ Virol       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Biotic interactions and sunlight affect persistence of fecal indicator bacteria and microbial source tracking genetic markers in the upper Mississippi river.

Authors:  Asja Korajkic; Brian R McMinn; Orin C Shanks; Mano Sivaganesan; G Shay Fout; Nicholas J Ashbolt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.