Literature DB >> 19818904

Magnetic resonance spectroscopy and diffusion tensor imaging in coma survivors: promises and pitfalls.

Luaba Tshibanda1, Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse, Damien Galanaud, Mélanie Boly, Steven Laureys, Louis Puybasset.   

Abstract

The status of comatose patient is currently established on the basis of the patient-exhibited behaviors. Clinical assessment is subjective and, in 40% of patients, fails to distinguish vegetative state (VS) from minimally conscious states (MCS). The technologic advances of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have dramatically improved our understanding of these altered states of consciousness. The role of neuroimaging in coma survivors has increased beyond the simple evaluation of morphological abnormalities. The development of 1H-MR spectroscopy (MRS) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) provide opportunity to evaluate processes that cannot be approached by current morphologic MRI sequences. They offer potentially unique insights into the histopathology of VS and MCS. The MRS is a powerful noninvasive imaging technique that enables the in vivo quantification of certain chemical compound or metabolites as N-acetylaspartate (NAA), Choline (Cho), and Creatine (Cr). These biomarkers explore neuronal integrity (NAA), cell membrane turnover (Cho), and cell energetic function (Cr). DTI is an effective and proved quantitative method for evaluating tissue integrity at microscopic level. It provides information about the microstructure and the architecture of tissues, especially the white matter. Various physical parameters can be extracted from this sequence: the fractional anisotropy (FA), a marker of white matter integrity; mean diffusivity (MD); and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) which can differentiate cytotoxic and vasogenic edema. The most prominent findings with MRS and DTI performed in traumatic brain-injured (TBI) patients in subacute phase are the reduction of the NAA/Cr ratio in posterior pons and the decrease of mean infratentorial and supratentorial FA except in posterior pons that enables to predict unfavorable outcome at 1 year from TBI with up to 86% sensitivity and 97% specificity. This review will focus on the interest of comatose patients MRI multimodal assessment with MRS and DTI. It will emphasize the advantages and pitfalls of these techniques in particular in predicting the coma survivors' outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19818904     DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(09)17715-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  13 in total

1.  Comment on "Preserved feedforward but impaired top-down processes in the vegetative state".

Authors:  Jean-Rémi King; Tristan Bekinschtein; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  How to Translate Time: The Temporal Aspects of Rodent and Human Pathobiological Processes in Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Denes V Agoston; Robert Vink; Adel Helmy; Mårten Risling; David Nelson; Mayumi Prins
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 3.  Neural correlates of consciousness: what we know and what we have to learn!

Authors:  Rocco Salvatore Calabrò; Alberto Cacciola; Placido Bramanti; Demetrio Milardi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 4.  Emerging imaging tools for use with traumatic brain injury research.

Authors:  Jill V Hunter; Elisabeth A Wilde; Karen A Tong; Barbara A Holshouser
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 5.  Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: the state of the science.

Authors:  Joseph T Giacino; Joseph J Fins; Steven Laureys; Nicholas D Schiff
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 42.937

Review 6.  Measuring consciousness in coma and related states.

Authors:  Carol Di Perri; Aurore Thibaut; Lizette Heine; Andrea Soddu; Athena Demertzi; Steven Laureys
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-28

7.  Single-trial decoding of auditory novelty responses facilitates the detection of residual consciousness.

Authors:  J R King; F Faugeras; A Gramfort; A Schurger; I El Karoui; J D Sitt; B Rohaut; C Wacongne; E Labyt; T Bekinschtein; L Cohen; L Naccache; S Dehaene
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Neural plasticity lessons from disorders of consciousness.

Authors:  Athena Demertzi; Caroline Schnakers; Andrea Soddu; Marie-Aurélie Bruno; Olivia Gosseries; Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse; Steven Laureys
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-02-07

9.  Consciousness and the prefrontal parietal network: insights from attention, working memory, and chunking.

Authors:  Daniel Bor; Anil K Seth
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-12

10.  Repetitive traumatic brain injury and development of chronic traumatic encephalopathy: a potential role for biomarkers in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment?

Authors:  Ryan C Turner; Brandon P Lucke-Wold; Matthew J Robson; Bennet I Omalu; Anthony L Petraglia; Julian E Bailes
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.