Literature DB >> 19818837

Does willingness affect the N2-P3 effect of deceptive and honest responses?

Haiyan Wu1, Xiaoqing Hu, Genyue Fu.   

Abstract

The present investigation examined the effect of willingness on honest and deceptive responses. Event-related potentials were recorded while participants made deceptive and honest response that were either self-determined or forced. Results showed that the reaction time was faster in response to old words compared to new words and honest responses were faster than deceptive responses. In addition, the P300 of honest responses was significantly more positive than deceptive responses and a significant main effect of willingness indicated that the P300 amplitude, elicited by self-determined responses, was more positive than forced responses. Moreover, the conflict detection N2 component was significantly more negative-going in the lying versus honest responses at Cz. The main effect of willingness also revealed that the forced response evoked a more negative N2 than the self-determined response. These results suggested that deception may involve conflict detection and that there are significant differences in neurological processing between forced deception and self-determined deception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19818837     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  9 in total

1.  Electrophysiological markers of working memory usage as an index for truth-based lies.

Authors:  Yu-Hui Lo; Philip Tseng
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Effects of Online Single Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Prefrontal and Parietal Cortices in Deceptive Processing: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Bruce Luber; Lysianne Beynel; Timothy Spellman; Hannah Gura; Markus Ploesser; Kate Termini; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.473

3.  Altruistic and self-serving goals modulate behavioral and neural responses in deception.

Authors:  Fang Cui; Song Wu; Haiyan Wu; Chengyao Wang; Can Jiao; Yuejia Luo
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying deceptive hazard evaluation: An event-related potentials investigation.

Authors:  Huijian Fu; Wenwei Qiu; Haiying Ma; Qingguo Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Does Gender Make a Difference in Deception? The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex.

Authors:  Mei Gao; Xiaolan Yang; Jinchuan Shi; Yiyang Lin; Shu Chen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-20

6.  Mentalizing During Social Interaction: The Development and Validation of the Interactive Mentalizing Questionnaire.

Authors:  Haiyan Wu; Bowen J Fung; Dean Mobbs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-17

7.  Neural Correlates of Drug-Related Attentional Bias in Heroin Dependence.

Authors:  Qinglin Zhao; Hongqian Li; Bin Hu; Yonghui Li; Céline R Gillebert; Dante Mantini; Quanying Liu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  The Effects of Money on Fake Rating Behavior in E-Commerce: Electrophysiological Time Course Evidence From Consumers.

Authors:  Cuicui Wang; Yun Li; Xuan Luo; Qingguo Ma; Weizhong Fu; Huijian Fu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Sophisticated Deception in Junior Middle School Students: An ERP Study.

Authors:  Haizhou Leng; Yanrong Wang; Qian Li; Lizhu Yang; Yan Sun
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.