BACKGROUND: Although the epidemiology of scrapie has been broadly understood for many years, attempts to introduce voluntary or compulsory controls to eradicate the disease have frequently failed. Lack of precision in defining the risk factors on farm has been one of the challenges to designing control strategies. This study attempted to define which parts of the annual flock management cycle represented the greatest risk of infection to naive lambs exposed to the farm environment at different times. RESULTS: In VRQ/VRQ lambs exposed to infected sheep at pasture or during lambing, and exposed to the buildings in which lambing took place, the attack rate was high and survival times were short. Where exposure was to pasture alone the number of sheep affected in each experimental group was reduced, and survival times were longer and related to length of exposure. CONCLUSION: At the flock level, eradication and control strategies for scrapie must take into account the need to decontaminate buildings used for lambing, and to reduce (or prevent) the exposure of lambs to infected sheep, especially in the later stages of incubation, and at lambing. The potential for environmental contamination from pasture should also be considered. Genotype selection may still prove to be the only viable tool to prevent infection from contaminated pasture, reduce environmental contamination and limit direct transmission from sheep to sheep.
BACKGROUND: Although the epidemiology of scrapie has been broadly understood for many years, attempts to introduce voluntary or compulsory controls to eradicate the disease have frequently failed. Lack of precision in defining the risk factors on farm has been one of the challenges to designing control strategies. This study attempted to define which parts of the annual flock management cycle represented the greatest risk of infection to naive lambs exposed to the farm environment at different times. RESULTS: In VRQ/VRQ lambs exposed to infected sheep at pasture or during lambing, and exposed to the buildings in which lambing took place, the attack rate was high and survival times were short. Where exposure was to pasture alone the number of sheep affected in each experimental group was reduced, and survival times were longer and related to length of exposure. CONCLUSION: At the flock level, eradication and control strategies for scrapie must take into account the need to decontaminate buildings used for lambing, and to reduce (or prevent) the exposure of lambs to infected sheep, especially in the later stages of incubation, and at lambing. The potential for environmental contamination from pasture should also be considered. Genotype selection may still prove to be the only viable tool to prevent infection from contaminated pasture, reduce environmental contamination and limit direct transmission from sheep to sheep.
Authors: R I Carp; H C Meeker; R Rubenstein; S Sigurdarson; M Papini; R J Kascsak; P B Kozlowski; H M Wisniewski Journal: J Neurovirol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 2.643
Authors: Anne M Healy; Deirdre Hannon; Kenton L Morgan; Edwin Weavers; J Dan Collins; Michael L Doherty Journal: Prev Vet Med Date: 2004-07-16 Impact factor: 2.670
Authors: M Baylis; C Chihota; E Stevenson; W Goldmann; A Smith; K Sivam; S Tongue; M B Gravenor Journal: J Gen Virol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.891
Authors: Raymond Bujdoso; Andrew Smith; Oliver Fleck; John Spiropoulos; Olivier Andréoletti; Alana M Thackray Journal: Cell Tissue Res Date: 2022-01-29 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Linda A Terry; Laurence Howells; Keith Bishop; Claire A Baker; Sally Everest; Leigh Thorne; Ben C Maddison; Kevin C Gough Journal: Vet Res Date: 2011-05-18 Impact factor: 3.683
Authors: A Christy Wyckoff; Nathan Galloway; Crystal Meyerett-Reid; Jenny Powers; Terry Spraker; Ryan J Monello; Bruce Pulford; Margaret Wild; Michael Antolin; Kurt VerCauteren; Mark Zabel Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-02-10 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: A Christy Wyckoff; Krista L Lockwood; Crystal Meyerett-Reid; Brady A Michel; Heather Bender; Kurt C VerCauteren; Mark D Zabel Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: S Georgiadou; A Ortiz-Pelaez; M M Simmons; O Windl; M Dawson; P Neocleous; P Papasavva-Stylianou Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 4.434
Authors: Timm Konold; Stephen A C Hawkins; Lisa C Thurston; Ben C Maddison; Kevin C Gough; Anthony Duarte; Hugh A Simmons Journal: Front Vet Sci Date: 2015-09-14