OBJECTIVE: To investigate the patterns of expression of the junctional proteins beta-catenin and claudins in different prognostic groups of patients with prostatic cancer, to determine their value as prognostic markers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the samples of 30 patients who had a radical prostatectomy for organ-confined cancer (pT2N0M0), men with clinically advanced cancer, and a control group with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Using immunohistochemistry applied to tissue microarrays, each group was evaluated for claudin-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -7, -8 and -10, and beta-catenin expression. RESULTS: There were differences among the three groups in the expression of claudin-1 (P = 0.001), -2 (P = 0.014), -3 (P = 0.027), -4 (P = 0.001), -8 (P = 0.001) and beta-catenin (P = 0.002), regardless of Gleason score. By contrast, claudin-5, -7 and -10 patterns were not significantly different among the groups. Furthermore, claudin-1 (P = 0.014) and -4 (P = 0.004) could be used to distinguish between those patients who had metastases and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of claudin expression could be a novel diagnostic marker in re-classifying adenocarcinomas, and an additional sensitive predictive factor for a clinically poor prognosis. Our results suggest that patients with organ-confined and advanced cancer are subsets with distinct claudin expression profiles, and that claudin-4 is related to cellular differentiation in prostate cancer, which is not only the receptor molecule for the Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin, and thus a theoretical future therapeutic target for prostate cancer, but also a marker of progression.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the patterns of expression of the junctional proteins beta-catenin and claudins in different prognostic groups of patients with prostatic cancer, to determine their value as prognostic markers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the samples of 30 patients who had a radical prostatectomy for organ-confined cancer (pT2N0M0), men with clinically advanced cancer, and a control group with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Using immunohistochemistry applied to tissue microarrays, each group was evaluated for claudin-1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -7, -8 and -10, and beta-catenin expression. RESULTS: There were differences among the three groups in the expression of claudin-1 (P = 0.001), -2 (P = 0.014), -3 (P = 0.027), -4 (P = 0.001), -8 (P = 0.001) and beta-catenin (P = 0.002), regardless of Gleason score. By contrast, claudin-5, -7 and -10 patterns were not significantly different among the groups. Furthermore, claudin-1 (P = 0.014) and -4 (P = 0.004) could be used to distinguish between those patients who had metastases and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of claudin expression could be a novel diagnostic marker in re-classifying adenocarcinomas, and an additional sensitive predictive factor for a clinically poor prognosis. Our results suggest that patients with organ-confined and advanced cancer are subsets with distinct claudin expression profiles, and that claudin-4 is related to cellular differentiation in prostate cancer, which is not only the receptor molecule for the Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin, and thus a theoretical future therapeutic target for prostate cancer, but also a marker of progression.
Authors: Hanuma K Karnati; Manas Panigrahi; Noor A Shaik; Nigel H Greig; S Appala R Bagadi; Mohammad A Kamal; Nagaiah Kapalavayi Journal: CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets Date: 2014 Impact factor: 4.388
Authors: Péter Törzsök; Péter Riesz; István Kenessey; Eszter Székely; Aron Somorácz; Péter Nyirády; Imre Romics; Zsuzsa Schaff; Gábor Lotz; András Kiss Journal: J Histochem Cytochem Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 2.479
Authors: Györgyi A Nelhűbel; Boróka Károly; Balázs Szabó; Gábor Lotz; András Kiss; József Tóvári; István Kenessey Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2013-07-12 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: A Marcell Szász; Attila Majoros; Philip Rosen; Shiv Srivastava; Albert Dobi; Attila Szendrői; Janina Kulka; Péter Nyirády Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2013-05-18 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Judit Moldvay; Katalin Fábián; Márta Jäckel; Zsuzsanna Németh; Krisztina Bogos; József Furák; László Tiszlavicz; János Fillinger; Balázs Döme; Zsuzsa Schaff Journal: Pathol Oncol Res Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 3.201
Authors: Sandeep K Nadendla; Allon Hazan; Matt Ward; Lisa J Harper; Karwan Moutasim; Lucia S Bianchi; Mahmoud Naase; Lucy Ghali; Gareth J Thomas; David M Prowse; Michael P Philpott; Graham W Neill Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 3.240