INTRODUCTION: There remains an unmet need for safe and effective antiarrhythmic drugs, especially for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Vanoxerine is a drug that is free of adverse cardiac events in normal volunteers, yet is a potent blocker of the hERG (hK(v)11.1) cardiac potassium channel. Consequently,we hypothesized that vanoxerine might also be a potent blocker of cardiac calcium (Ca) and sodium (Na) currents, and would not affect transmural dispersion of repolarization. METHODS: The whole cell patch clamp technique was used to measure currents from cloned ion channels overexpressed in stable cell lines and single ventricular myocytes. We measured intracellular action potentials from canine ventricular wedges and Purkinje fibers using sharp microelectrode technique. RESULTS: We found that vanoxerine was a potent hK(v)11.1 blocker, and at submicromolar concentrations, it blocked Ca and Na currents in a strongly frequency-dependent manner. In the canine ventricular wedge preparation vanoxerine did not significantly affect transmural action potential waveforms, QT interval or transmural dispersion of repolarization. CONCLUSIONS: Vanoxerine (1) is a potent blocker of cardiac hERG, Na and Ca channels; (2) block is strongly frequency-dependent especially for Na and Ca channels; and (3) transmural dispersion of ventricular repolarization is unaffected. The multichannel block and repolarization uniformity resemble the effects of amiodarone, the exemplar atrial fibrillation drug. Vanoxerine is a completely different chemical and has none of amiodarone's toxic effects. Vanoxerine has characteristics of a potentially effective and safe antiarrhythmic.
INTRODUCTION: There remains an unmet need for safe and effective antiarrhythmic drugs, especially for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Vanoxerine is a drug that is free of adverse cardiac events in normal volunteers, yet is a potent blocker of the hERG (hK(v)11.1) cardiac potassium channel. Consequently,we hypothesized that vanoxerine might also be a potent blocker of cardiac calcium (Ca) and sodium (Na) currents, and would not affect transmural dispersion of repolarization. METHODS: The whole cell patch clamp technique was used to measure currents from cloned ion channels overexpressed in stable cell lines and single ventricular myocytes. We measured intracellular action potentials from canine ventricular wedges and Purkinje fibers using sharp microelectrode technique. RESULTS: We found that vanoxerine was a potent hK(v)11.1 blocker, and at submicromolar concentrations, it blocked Ca and Na currents in a strongly frequency-dependent manner. In the canine ventricular wedge preparation vanoxerine did not significantly affect transmural action potential waveforms, QT interval or transmural dispersion of repolarization. CONCLUSIONS:Vanoxerine (1) is a potent blocker of cardiac hERG, Na and Ca channels; (2) block is strongly frequency-dependent especially for Na and Ca channels; and (3) transmural dispersion of ventricular repolarization is unaffected. The multichannel block and repolarization uniformity resemble the effects of amiodarone, the exemplar atrial fibrillation drug. Vanoxerine is a completely different chemical and has none of amiodarone's toxic effects. Vanoxerine has characteristics of a potentially effective and safe antiarrhythmic.
Authors: Antonio E Lacerda; Yuri A Kuryshev; Yuan Chen; Muthukrishnan Renganathan; Heather Eng; Sanjay J Danthi; James W Kramer; Tianen Yang; Arthur M Brown Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2007-11-06 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Denis Roy; Craig M Pratt; Christian Torp-Pedersen; D George Wyse; Egon Toft; Steen Juul-Moller; Tonny Nielsen; S Lind Rasmussen; Ian G Stiell; Benoit Coutu; John H Ip; Edward L C Pritchett; A John Camm Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-03-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Naomichi Matsumoto; Celeen M Khrestian; Kyungmoo Ryu; Antonio E Lacerda; Arthur M Brown; Albert L Waldo Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2009-10-08
Authors: Ivan Cakulev; Antonio E Lacerda; Celeen M Khrestian; Kyungmoo Ryu; Arthur M Brown; Albert L Waldo Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2011-05-26
Authors: Rebecca Hagan; Elizabeth Rex; David Woody; Monika Milewski; Thomas Glaza; Michael P Maher; Yi Liu Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Jean-Pierre Valentin; Peter Hoffmann; Catherine Ortemann-Renon; John Koerner; Jennifer Pierson; Gary Gintant; James Willard; Christine Garnett; Matthew Skinner; Hugo M Vargas; Todd Wisialowski; Michael K Pugsley Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2022-04-26 Impact factor: 4.109
Authors: James Kramer; Carlos A Obejero-Paz; Glenn Myatt; Yuri A Kuryshev; Andrew Bruening-Wright; Joseph S Verducci; Arthur M Brown Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2013 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Carlos A Obejero-Paz; Andrew Bruening-Wright; James Kramer; Peter Hawryluk; Milos Tatalovic; Howard C Dittrich; Arthur M Brown Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-11-30 Impact factor: 4.379