Literature DB >> 19817846

Conflicting selection from an antagonist and a mutualist enhances phenotypic variation in a plant.

Adam M Siepielski1, Craig W Benkman.   

Abstract

The raw material for evolution is variation. Consequently, identifying the factors that generate, maintain, and erode phenotypic and genetic variation in ecologically important traits within and among populations is important. Although persistent directional or stabilizing selection can deplete variation, spatial variation in conflicting directional selection can enhance variation. Here, we present evidence that phenotypic variation in limber pine (Pinus flexilis) cone structure is enhanced by conflicting selection pressures exerted by its mutualistic seed disperser (Clark's nutcracker Nucifraga columbiana) and an antagonistic seed predator (pine squirrel Tamiasciurus spp.). Phenotypic variation in cone structure was bimodal and about two times greater where both agents of selection co-occurred than where one (the seed predator) was absent. Within the region where both agents of selection co-occurred, bimodality in cone structure was pronounced where there appears to be a mosaic of habitats with some persistent habitats supporting only the seed disperser. These results indicate that conflicting selection stemming from spatial variation in community diversity can enhance phenotypic variation in ecologically important traits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19817846     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00867.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  8 in total

1.  Mutualists and antagonists drive among-population variation in selection and evolution of floral display in a perennial herb.

Authors:  Jon Agren; Frida Hellström; Per Toräng; Johan Ehrlén
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Geographic consistency and variation in conflicting selection generated by pollinators and seed predators.

Authors:  Shi-Guo Sun; W Scott Armbruster; Shuang-Quan Huang
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Strong among population variation in frugivory strength by functional diverse frugivores: a 'reciprocal translocation' experiment.

Authors:  Pedro J Garrote; Gemma Calvo; Magdalena Żywiec; Miguel Delibes; Alberto Suárez-Esteban; José M Fedriani
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Species interactions alter evolutionary responses to a novel environment.

Authors:  Diane Lawrence; Francesca Fiegna; Volker Behrends; Jacob G Bundy; Albert B Phillimore; Thomas Bell; Timothy G Barraclough
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 5.  Intrinsic and extrinsic drivers of intraspecific variation in seed dispersal are diverse and pervasive.

Authors:  Eugene W Schupp; Rafal Zwolak; Landon R Jones; Rebecca S Snell; Noelle G Beckman; Clare Aslan; Brittany R Cavazos; Edu Effiom; Evan C Fricke; Flavia Montaño-Centellas; John Poulsen; Onja H Razafindratsima; Manette E Sandor; Katriona Shea
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 3.276

6.  Habitat generalist species constrain the diversity of mimicry rings in heterogeneous habitats.

Authors:  Irina Birskis-Barros; André V L Freitas; Paulo R Guimarães
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The importance of aboveground-belowground interactions on the evolution and maintenance of variation in plant defense traits.

Authors:  Moniek van Geem; Rieta Gols; Nicole M van Dam; Wim H van der Putten; Taiadjana Fortuna; Jeffrey A Harvey
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Genetic conflict with a parasitic nematode disrupts the legume-rhizobia mutualism.

Authors:  Corlett W Wood; Bonnie L Pilkington; Priya Vaidya; Caroline Biel; John R Stinchcombe
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2018-04-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.