Literature DB >> 19817148

Timing flickers across sensory modalities.

Carmelo Mario Vicario1, Gaetano Rappo, Anna Maria Pepi, Massimiliano Oliveri.   

Abstract

In tasks requiring a comparison of the duration of a reference and a test visual cue, the spatial position of test cue is likely to be implicitly coded, providing a form of a congruency effect or introducing a response bias according to the environmental scale or its vectorial reference. The precise mechanism generating these perceptual shifts in subjective duration is not understood, although several studies suggest that spatial attentional factors may play a critical role. Here we use a duration comparison task within and across sensory modalities to examine if temporal performance is also modulated when people are exposed to spatial distractors involving different sensory modalities. Different groups of healthy participants performed duration comparison tasks in separate sessions: a time comparison task of visual stimuli during exposure to spatially presented auditory distractors; and a time comparison task of auditory stimuli during exposure to spatially presented visual distractors. We found the duration of visual stimuli biased depending on the spatial position of auditory distractors. Observers underestimated the duration of stimuli presented in the left spatial field, while there was an overestimation trend in estimating the duration of stimuli presented in the right spatial field. In contrast, timing of auditory stimuli was unaffected by exposure to visual distractors. These results support the existence of multisensory interactions between space and time showing that, in cross-modal paradigms, the presence of auditory distractors can modify visuo-temporal perception but not vice versa. This asymmetry is discussed in terms of sensory perceptual differences between the two systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19817148     DOI: 10.1068/p6362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  11 in total

Review 1.  Audiotactile interactions in temporal perception.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

2.  Left hand dominance affects supra-second time processing.

Authors:  Carmelo Mario Vicario; Sonia Bonní; Giacomo Koch
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-24

3.  Cultural modulations of space-time compatibility effects.

Authors:  Antonino Vallesi; Yael Weisblatt; Carlo Semenza; Samuel Shaki
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-06

4.  The Perception of Time Is Underestimated in Adolescents With Anorexia Nervosa.

Authors:  Carmelo M Vicario; Kim Felmingham
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Alexithymia Is Linked with a Negative Bias for Past and Current Events in Healthy Humans.

Authors:  Silvia Barchetta; Gabriella Martino; Giuseppe Craparo; Mohammad A Salehinejad; Michael A Nitsche; Carmelo M Vicario
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Shared deficits in space, time, and quantity processing in childhood genetic disorders.

Authors:  Carmelo M Vicario; Mark J Yates; Michael E R Nicholls
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-07

7.  Cognitively controlled timing and executive functions develop in parallel? A glimpse on childhood research.

Authors:  Carmelo M Vicario
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.558

8.  Grounding magnitudes.

Authors:  Luca De Simone
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-08

9.  On a generalized magnitude system in the brain: an integrative perspective.

Authors:  Carmelo M Vicario
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-11-12

10.  A Mental Timeline for Duration From the Age of 5 Years Old.

Authors:  Jennifer T Coull; Katherine A Johnson; Sylvie Droit-Volet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.