Literature DB >> 19816695

The ongoing problem with peripheral lymphadenopathies: which ones are malignant?

Ayşe Karaman1, Ibrahim Karaman, Yusuf Hakan Cavuşoğlu, Derya Erdoğan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Peripheral lymphadenopathy is frequently encountered in children, but it is difficult to determine the etiology. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the risk of malignancy in childhood peripheral lymphadenopathy, determine the factors accompanying a malignant etiology and find out which additional findings strongly indicate malignancy.
METHODS: Patients from whom a peripheral lymphadenopathy biopsy had been obtained between January 2005 and December 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups as malignant and benign.
RESULTS: There were 32 patients in the malignant group and 52 in the benign group. The mean age was higher (P < 0.001), lymphadenopathy duration shorter (P = 0.007) and lymphadenopathy size larger (P = 0.019) in the malignant group. The incidence of malignancy was higher in supraclavicular and axillary lymphadenopathies. Hodgkin's disease was the most common disease in the malignant group, while it was reactive lymphoid hyperplasia in the benign group. The biopsy result was malignant in 58.3% of abdominal and 60% of mediastinal lymphadenopathy cases. The best indicator for malignancy was a hypoactive spleen nodule.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased patient age, supraclavicular lymphadenopathy localization, presence of abdominal or mediastinal lymphadenopathy and especially a hypoactive spleen nodule increase the risk of malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19816695     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-009-2498-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  6 in total

1.  Diagnostic aspects of cervical lymphadenopathy in children in the developing world: a study of 1,877 surgical specimens.

Authors:  S W Moore; J W Schneider; H S Schaaf
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  The etiology of peripheral lymphadenopathy in children.

Authors:  C Karadeniz; A Oguz; U Ezer; G Oztürk; A Dursun
Journal:  Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.969

3.  Analysis of children with peripheral lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  Nilgun Yaris; Murat Cakir; Emin Sözen; Umit Cobanoglu
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.168

4.  Predictors of malignancy in childhood peripheral lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  O S Soldes; J G Younger; R B Hirschl
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Evaluation of peripheral lymphadenopathy in children.

Authors:  Aynur Oguz; Ceyda Karadeniz; Ebru Atike Temel; Elvan Caglar Citak; F Visal Okur
Journal:  Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2006 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 1.969

6.  When is lymph node biopsy indicated in children with enlarged peripheral nodes?

Authors:  P J Knight; A F Mulne; L E Vassy
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 7.124

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Predictive factors for malignancy in patients with persistent cervical lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  Fatih Celenk; Secaattin Gulsen; Elif Baysal; Ismail Aytac; Seval Kul; Muzaffer Kanlikama
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Clinical Characteristics of and Cancer Incidence in Children Evaluated for Lymphadenoapthy Referred to Pediatric Oncology Clinics.

Authors:  Sema Vural; Dildar Bahar Genc; Ezgi Celikboya
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2019-10-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.