Literature DB >> 19816630

The use of endoscopic ultrasonography and other imaging modalities in the preoperative staging of rectal villous tumours: a case of overstaging by magnetic resonance imaging.

Michelle C Buresi1, Iman Zandieh, Alexander G Nagy, Audrey Spielmann, William C Yee, Alan A Weiss, Eric M Yoshida.   

Abstract

A case of a 60-year-old man with recurrent rectal villous adenoma is described. Preoperative staging with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed very discordant results. EUS showed a tumour present in the mucosa with no submucosal invasion, while MRI revealed invasion of the muscularis propria consistent with an invasive stage T2 carcinoma. Based on the MRI findings, the patient underwent a low anterior resection of the tumour. The surgical pathology specimen revealed a villous adenoma with lowgrade dysplasia but no carcinoma and no extension into the muscularis propria. The present case highlights the uncertainty that currently exists as to which imaging modality provides the greatest accuracy in the staging of rectal cancer and in guiding the type of surgical procedure performed. Two recent meta-analyses and a systematic review of the literature point to EUS as the imaging modality of choice for determining muscularis propria and perirectal tissue invasion, as well as nodal involvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19816630      PMCID: PMC2776556          DOI: 10.1155/2009/750979

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0835-7900            Impact factor:   3.522


  12 in total

1.  Rectal cancer: local staging and assessment of lymph node involvement with endoluminal US, CT, and MR imaging--a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shandra Bipat; Afina S Glas; Frederik J M Slors; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Imaging for predicting the risk factors--the circumferential resection margin and nodal disease--of local recurrence in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  M J Lahaye; S M E Engelen; P J Nelemans; G L Beets; C J H van de Velde; J M A van Engelshoven; R G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 3.  Recent developments in the role of endoscopic ultrasonography in diseases of the colon and rectum.

Authors:  Manoop S Bhutani
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.287

4.  Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: comparison of 3-T high-field MRI and endorectal sonography.

Authors:  Ho-Kyung Chun; Dongil Choi; Min Ju Kim; Jongmee Lee; Seong Hyeon Yun; Seung Hoon Kim; Soon Jin Lee; Chan Kyo Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-09-19

Review 6.  Preoperative loco-regional imaging in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Anita R Skandarajah; Joe J Tjandra
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.872

7.  A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological variables in prognosis after resection of large bowel cancer.

Authors:  P H Chapuis; O F Dent; R Fisher; R C Newland; M T Pheils; E Smyth; K Colquhoun
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 8.  Rectal cancer: review with emphasis on MR imaging.

Authors:  Regina G H Beets-Tan; Geerard L Beets
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Local staging of rectal cancer: assessment with double-contrast multislice computed tomography and transrectal ultrasound.

Authors:  Christiane Kulinna; Juergen Scheidler; Tim Strauss; Harald Bonel; Karin Herrmann; Daniela Aust; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Large-bowel cancer in the young: a national survival study.

Authors:  W H Isbister; J Fraser
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  1 in total

1.  Is magnetic resonance imaging useful for the management of patients with rectal villous adenoma? A study of 45 consecutive patients treated by transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

Authors:  Lucas Raynaud; Diane Mege; Magaly Zappa; Nathalie Guedj; Valérie Vilgrain; Yves Panis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.571

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.