Literature DB >> 19816373

Reossification of cranium and zygomatic arch after monobloc frontofacial distraction advancement for syndromic craniosynostosis.

Akihiko Oyama1, Eric Arnaud, Daniel Marchac, Dominique Renier.   

Abstract

Monobloc frontofacial advancement with distraction is becoming more routinely used within craniofacial surgery for faciocraniosynostosis, because of the simultaneous correction obtained on the exorbitism and of the respiratory impairment. Reossification of the cranium and zygomatic bone in monobloc frontofacial advancement with distraction has not been assessed previously on long series. In this study, 40 patients, 22 Crouzon, 11 Apert, and 7 Pfeiffer syndrome who underwent a frontofacial monobloc advancement by distraction osteogenesis, were retrospectively reviewed, after a mean of 2.1 years of follow-up. The bone linkage between both margin of the coronal and zygomatic osteotomy gap was evaluated on three-dimensional computed tomographic scan postoperatively. The correlations between reossification and some clinical situations (diagnosis, existence of previous anterior craniofacial procedure, use of bone paste, and the age at operation) were studied to determine factors that influence on reossification. "Good" or "fair" reossification on coronal gap was demonstrated by 68.2% of those with Crouzon and 54.5% of those with Apert syndrome. In contrast, 85.7% of those with Pfeiffer syndrome had "poor" or "absent" reossification. Rebridging of the zygomatic arch in Pfeiffer was also the poorest among 3 syndromes. Previous operations performed before the frontofacial monobloc advancement decreased reossification of distraction gap. In the group of patients in whom autologous bone paste on coronal osteotomy gap was applied, the bone formation was improved in all syndromes significantly. The reossification of the coronal osteotomy gap in patients with Pfeiffer syndrome is poor compared with those with Crouzon and Apert syndromes. Bone paste is extremely effective on increasing osteogenesis even in patients with Pfeiffer syndrome or the patients with previous surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19816373     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181b6c634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  3 in total

1.  Faciocraniosynostosis: monobloc frontofacial osteotomy replacing the two-stage strategy?

Authors:  E Arnaud; F Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 2.  Three-dimensional imaging of soft and hard facial tissues in patients with craniofacial syndromes: a systematic review of methodological quality.

Authors:  Arianne Lewyllie; Maria Cadenas De Llano-Pérula; Anna Verdonck; Guy Willems
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Results and limits of posterior cranial vault expansion by osteotomy and internal distractors.

Authors:  Federico Di Rocco; Kenichi Usami; Tatiana Protzenko; Corinne Collet; Kim Giraudat; Eric Arnaud
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-10-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.