Literature DB >> 19816156

Reconstruction of orbital floor fractures: comparison of individual prefabricated titanium implants and calvarial bone grafts.

Lijuan Guo1, Weidong Tian, Fan Feng, Jie Long, Pengfei Li, Wei Tang.   

Abstract

We assessed fresh (< or = 2 weeks) and old (>2 weeks) orbital floor fractures and examined how selection of the implant affected the development of enophthalmos or the treatment of pre-existing enophthalmos. We conducted a retrospective review of 61 cases treated with calvarial bone grafting or individually prefabricated titanium mesh implants. The features of orbital floor fractures and orbital volume (OV) changes were analyzed by a 3-dimensional medical surface rendering image software system. The difference in OV before and after surgery was significant (P < 0.05) in fresh and old fractures treated with either calvarial bone or individually designed titanium mesh. The difference in OV between unaffected and postoperatively affected sides was not significant in the group that received the individually designed titanium mesh, but was significant in the group that received calvarial bone. Spearman rank correlation analysis indicated positive correlations between enophthalmos and postoperative OV changes after implantation of cranial bone in fresh fractures or titanium mesh in fresh and old fractures. The long-term degree of enophthalmos can be predicted with 3-dimensional medical surface rendering. Individual digitally designed titanium mesh is the proper choice of implant material to recover precise OV in fresh or older orbital fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19816156     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181999df3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  6 in total

1.  Accelerated osteomesh resorption: a case report.

Authors:  Samuel Y M Ho; Vigneswaran Nallanthamby; Marcus T C Wong
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2010-09

Review 2.  Orbital reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the role of patient-specific implants.

Authors:  Sanjeev Kotecha; Ashley Ferro; Patrick Harrison; Kathleen Fan
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-05-20

Review 3.  Retrospective analysis of orbital floor fractures--complications, outcome, and review of literature.

Authors:  Martin Gosau; Moritz Schöneich; Florian G Draenert; Tobias Ettl; Oliver Driemel; Torsten E Reichert
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  The Role of Computer-Assisted Technology in Post-Traumatic Orbital Reconstruction: A PRISMA-driven Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kelvin H Wan; Kelvin K L Chong; Alvin L Young
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Management of orbital fractures: challenges and solutions.

Authors:  Jennings R Boyette; John D Pemberton; Juliana Bonilla-Velez
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-11-17

Review 6.  The Dilemma of Reconstructive Material Choice for Orbital Floor Fracture: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Akash Sivam; Natalie Enninghorst
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.