Literature DB >> 19815830

Substantial observer variability in the differentiation between primary intracerebral hemorrhage and hemorrhagic transformation of infarction on CT brain imaging.

Caroline E Lovelock1, Philip Anslow, Andrew J Molyneux, James V Byrne, Wilhelm Kuker, Pieter M Pretorius, Andrew Coull, Peter M Rothwell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: CT remains the most commonly used imaging technique in acute stroke but is often delayed after minor stroke. Interobserver reliability in distinguishing hemorrhagic transformation of infarction from intracerebral hemorrhage may depend on delays to CT but has not been reported previously despite the clinical importance of this distinction.
METHODS: Initial CT scans with intraparenchymal hematoma from the first 1000 patients with stroke in the Oxford Vascular Study were independently categorized as intracerebral hemorrhage or hemorrhagic transformation of infarction by 5 neuroradiologists, both blinded and unblinded to clinical history. Thirty scans were reviewed twice. Agreement was quantified by the kappa statistic.
RESULTS: Seventy-eight scans showed intraparenchymal hematoma. Blinded pairwise interrater agreements for a diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage ranged from kappa=0.15 to 0.48 with poor overall agreement (kappa=0.35; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.54) even after unblinding (kappa=0.41; 0.21 to 0.60). Blinded intrarater agreements ranged from kappa=0.21 to 0.92. Lack of consensus after unblinding was greatest in patients scanned >or=24 hours after stroke onset (67% versus 25%, P=0.001) and in minor stroke (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale <or=5: 56% versus 29%, P=0.04) with disagreement in 75% of patients scanned >or=24 hours after minor stroke and in 48% of all 30-day stroke survivors in whom reliable diagnosis would be expected to influence long-term management.
CONCLUSIONS: Reliability of diagnosis of intraparenchymal hematoma on CT brain scan in minor stroke is poor, particularly if scanning is delayed. Immediate brain imaging is justified in patients with minor stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19815830     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.553933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  6 in total

Review 1.  Brain imaging in stroke: insight beyond diagnosis.

Authors:  May Nour; David S Liebeskind
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 2.  Imaging of cerebral ischemia: from acute stroke to chronic disorders.

Authors:  May Nour; David S Liebeskind
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 3.  European research priorities for intracerebral haemorrhage.

Authors:  Thorsten Steiner; Jesper Petersson; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Hanne Christensen; Charlotte Cordonnier; Laszlo Csiba; Sagi Harnof; Derk Krieger; David Mendelow; Carlos Molina; Joan Montaner; Karsten Overgaard; Risto O Roine; Erich Schmutzhard; Turgut Tatlisumak; Danilo Toni; Christian Stapf
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 2.762

4.  Acute intracerebral haemorrhage: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Iain J McGurgan; Wendy C Ziai; David J Werring; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Adrian R Parry-Jones
Journal:  Pract Neurol       Date:  2020-12-07

5.  Differentiating between Hemorrhagic Infarct and Parenchymal Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  P M C Choi; J V Ly; V Srikanth; H Ma; W Chong; M Holt; T G Phan
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-04-02

6.  Ten-year risks of recurrent stroke, disability, dementia and cost in relation to site of primary intracerebral haemorrhage: population-based study.

Authors:  Linxin Li; Ramon Luengo-Fernandez; Susanna M Zuurbier; Nicola C Beddows; Philippa Lavallee; Louise E Silver; Wilhelm Kuker; Peter Malcolm Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 10.154

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.