RATIONALE: Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a bronchoscopic procedure in which controlled thermal energy is applied to the airway wall to decrease smooth muscle. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of BT versus a sham procedure in subjects with severe asthma who remain symptomatic despite treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta(2)-agonists. METHODS: A total of 288 adult subjects (Intent-to-Treat [ITT]) randomized to BT or sham control underwent three bronchoscopy procedures. Primary outcome was the difference in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores from baseline to average of 6, 9, and 12 months (integrated AQLQ). Adverse events and health care use were collected to assess safety. Statistical design and analysis of the primary endpoint was Bayesian. Target posterior probability of superiority (PPS) of BT over sham was 95%, except for the primary endpoint (96.4%). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The improvement from baseline in the integrated AQLQ score was superior in the BT group compared with sham (BT, 1.35 +/- 1.10; sham, 1.16 +/- 1.23 [PPS, 96.0% ITT and 97.9% per protocol]). Seventy-nine percent of BT and 64% of sham subjects achieved changes in AQLQ of 0.5 or greater (PPS, 99.6%). Six percent more BT subjects were hospitalized in the treatment period (up to 6 wk after BT). In the posttreatment period (6-52 wk after BT), the BT group experienced fewer severe exacerbations, emergency department (ED) visits, and days missed from work/school compared with the sham group (PPS, 95.5, 99.9, and 99.3%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:BT in subjects with severe asthma improves asthma-specific quality of life with a reduction in severe exacerbations and healthcare use in the posttreatment period. Clinical trial registered with www.clinialtrials.gov (NCT00231114).
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a bronchoscopic procedure in which controlled thermal energy is applied to the airway wall to decrease smooth muscle. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of BT versus a sham procedure in subjects with severe asthma who remain symptomatic despite treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta(2)-agonists. METHODS: A total of 288 adult subjects (Intent-to-Treat [ITT]) randomized to BT or sham control underwent three bronchoscopy procedures. Primary outcome was the difference in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores from baseline to average of 6, 9, and 12 months (integrated AQLQ). Adverse events and health care use were collected to assess safety. Statistical design and analysis of the primary endpoint was Bayesian. Target posterior probability of superiority (PPS) of BT over sham was 95%, except for the primary endpoint (96.4%). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The improvement from baseline in the integrated AQLQ score was superior in the BT group compared with sham (BT, 1.35 +/- 1.10; sham, 1.16 +/- 1.23 [PPS, 96.0% ITT and 97.9% per protocol]). Seventy-nine percent of BT and 64% of sham subjects achieved changes in AQLQ of 0.5 or greater (PPS, 99.6%). Six percent more BT subjects were hospitalized in the treatment period (up to 6 wk after BT). In the posttreatment period (6-52 wk after BT), the BT group experienced fewer severe exacerbations, emergency department (ED) visits, and days missed from work/school compared with the sham group (PPS, 95.5, 99.9, and 99.3%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: BT in subjects with severe asthma improves asthma-specific quality of life with a reduction in severe exacerbations and healthcare use in the posttreatment period. Clinical trial registered with www.clinialtrials.gov (NCT00231114).
Authors: Stanley J Szefler; Herman Mitchell; Christine A Sorkness; Peter J Gergen; George T O'Connor; Wayne J Morgan; Meyer Kattan; Jacqueline A Pongracic; Stephen J Teach; Gordon R Bloomberg; Peyton A Eggleston; Rebecca S Gruchalla; Carolyn M Kercsmar; Andrew H Liu; Jeremy J Wildfire; Matthew D Curry; William W Busse Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-09-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: W Busse; J Corren; B Q Lanier; M McAlary; A Fowler-Taylor; G D Cioppa; A van As; N Gupta Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Robert A Wise; Susan J Bartlett; Ellen D Brown; Mario Castro; Rubin Cohen; Janet T Holbrook; Charles G Irvin; Cynthia S Rand; Marianna M Sockrider; Elizabeth A Sugar Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2009-07-25 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: J Bruce Moseley; Kimberly O'Malley; Nancy J Petersen; Terri J Menke; Baruch A Brody; David H Kuykendall; John C Hollingsworth; Carol M Ashton; Nelda P Wray Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-07-11 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jason A Tri; Christopher V DeSimone; Craig Daniels; Roshini S Asirvatham; Susan B Mikell; Dorothy J Ladewig; Kelly Krajnick; Samuel J Asirvatham Journal: Pulm Crit Care Med Date: 2016-11-06
Authors: Michael E Wechsler; Michel Laviolette; Adalberto S Rubin; Jussara Fiterman; Jose R Lapa e Silva; Pallav L Shah; Elie Fiss; Ronald Olivenstein; Neil C Thomson; Robert M Niven; Ian D Pavord; Michael Simoff; Jeff B Hales; Charlene McEvoy; Dirk-Jan Slebos; Mark Holmes; Martin J Phillips; Serpil C Erzurum; Nicola A Hanania; Kaharu Sumino; Monica Kraft; Gerard Cox; Daniel H Sterman; Kyle Hogarth; Joel N Kline; Adel H Mansur; Brian E Louie; William M Leeds; Richard G Barbers; John H M Austin; Narinder S Shargill; John Quiring; Brian Armstrong; Mario Castro Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Alfons Torrego; Ivan Solà; Ana Maria Munoz; Marta Roqué I Figuls; Juan Jose Yepes-Nuñez; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Vicente Plaza Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2014-03-03
Authors: Diana C Doeing; Amit K Mahajan; Steven R White; Edward T Naureckas; Jerry A Krishnan; Douglas K Hogarth Journal: J Asthma Date: 2012-12-20 Impact factor: 2.515