BACKGROUND: The eldercare sector is characterized by a shortage of labour and a high turnover rate, which constitutes a major challenge for the ageing societies of western Europe. The aim of the present study was to investigate if a low level of psychological well-being at the time of graduation predicts dropout among eldercare workers two years later. METHODS: We included 4,968 female eldercare trainees in this prospective study, recruited from 27 of the 28 Danish colleges for eldercare. Psychological well-being in 2004 was measured with the five-item Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5) of the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). We linked the survey data with national register data to obtain information about labour market attachment two years after qualification. RESULTS: In 2006, 37% of all participants had left the eldercare sector. Compared to participants with high psychological well-being at baseline, participants with medium and low psychological well-being were more likely to dropout to sectors unrelated to health and welfare (odds ratio (OR) 1.40 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.06-1.85) and 1.66 (95% CI = 1.27-2.19), respectively). They were also more likely to drop out of the labour market (OR 1.48 (95% CI = 1.08-2.04) and 1.60 (95% CI = 1.12-2.20), respectively). Psychological well-being was not related to dropout to other health- and welfare sectors or dropout to further education. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that more than one third of all participants had left the eldercare sector two years after qualification demonstrates the importance of retention initiatives early in working life. In addition a focus on psychological well-being among eldercare workers should be considered.
BACKGROUND: The eldercare sector is characterized by a shortage of labour and a high turnover rate, which constitutes a major challenge for the ageing societies of western Europe. The aim of the present study was to investigate if a low level of psychological well-being at the time of graduation predicts dropout among eldercare workers two years later. METHODS: We included 4,968 female eldercare trainees in this prospective study, recruited from 27 of the 28 Danish colleges for eldercare. Psychological well-being in 2004 was measured with the five-item Mental Health Inventory (MHI-5) of the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). We linked the survey data with national register data to obtain information about labour market attachment two years after qualification. RESULTS: In 2006, 37% of all participants had left the eldercare sector. Compared to participants with high psychological well-being at baseline, participants with medium and low psychological well-being were more likely to dropout to sectors unrelated to health and welfare (odds ratio (OR) 1.40 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.06-1.85) and 1.66 (95% CI = 1.27-2.19), respectively). They were also more likely to drop out of the labour market (OR 1.48 (95% CI = 1.08-2.04) and 1.60 (95% CI = 1.12-2.20), respectively). Psychological well-being was not related to dropout to other health- and welfare sectors or dropout to further education. CONCLUSIONS: The fact that more than one third of all participants had left the eldercare sector two years after qualification demonstrates the importance of retention initiatives early in working life. In addition a focus on psychological well-being among eldercare workers should be considered.
Authors: Christina Malmose Stapelfeldt; Claus Vinther Nielsen; Niels Trolle Andersen; Line Krane; Nils Fleten; Vilhelm Borg; Chris Jensen Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Delphine S Courvoisier; Thomas Agoritsas; Thomas V Perneger; Ralph E Schmidt; Stéphane Cullati Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-08-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sarah J Hewko; Sarah L Cooper; Hanhmi Huynh; Trish L Spiwek; Heather L Carleton; Shawna Reid; Greta G Cummings Journal: BMC Nurs Date: 2015-07-22
Authors: Silvia C Richner; Stéphane Cullati; Boris Cheval; Ralph E Schmidt; Pierre Chopard; Christoph A Meier; Delphine S Courvoisier Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Leah Adeline Phillips; Nyla de Los Santos; Henry Ntanda; Jennifer Jackson Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2022-03-19 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Cathrine F Hjorth; Line Bilgrav; Louise Sjørslev Frandsen; Charlotte Overgaard; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Berit Nielsen; Henrik Bøggild Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 3.295