Literature DB >> 19815638

Chromosome 3p12.3-p14.2 and 3q26.2-q26.32 are genomic markers for prognosis of advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Jim Jinn-Chyuan Sheu1, Chia-Huei Lee, Jenq-Yuh Ko, George S W Tsao, Chung-Chun Wu, Chih-Yeu Fang, Fuu-Jen Tsai, Chun-Hung Hua, Chi-Long Chen, Jen-Yang Chen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is an epithelial malignancy with a remarkable racial and geographic distribution. Previous cytogenetic studies have shown nasopharyngeal carcinoma to be characterized by gross genomic aberrations. However, identification of susceptible gene loci in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma has been poorly discussed. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: A genome-wide survey of gene copy number changes was initiated with two nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell lines by array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis. These alterations were confirmed by a parallel analysis with the data from the gene expression microarray and were validated by quantitative PCR. Clinical association of the defined target genes was analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization on 48 metastatic tumors.
RESULTS: A high percentage of genes were consistently altered in dosage and expression levels with gain on 3q26.2-q26.32 and losses on 3p12.3-p14.2 and 9p21.3-p23. Six candidate genes, GPR160 (3q26.2-q27), SKIL (3q26), ADAMTS9 (3p14.2-p14.3), LRIG1 (3p14), MPDZ (9p22-p24), and ADFP (9p22.1) were validated by quantitative PCR. Fluorescence in situ hybridization studies revealed amplification of GPR160 (in 25% of cases) and SKIL (33%); and deletion of ADAMTS9 (30%), LRIG1 (35%), MPDZ (15%), and ADFP (15%). Clinical association analyses indicated a poor survival rate with genetic alterations at the defined 3p deletion (P = 0.0012) and the 3q amplification regions (P = 0.0114).
CONCLUSION: The combined microarray technologies suggested novel candidate oncogenes, amplification of GPR160 and SKIL at 3q26.2-q26.32, and deletion of tumor suppressor genes ADAMTS9 and LRIG1 at 3p12.3-p14.2. Altered expression of these genes may be responsible for malignant progression and could be used as potential markers for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19815638     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  14 in total

1.  The genomic landscape of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  De-Chen Lin; Xuan Meng; Masaharu Hazawa; Yasunobu Nagata; Ana Maria Varela; Liang Xu; Yusuke Sato; Li-Zhen Liu; Ling-Wen Ding; Arjun Sharma; Boon Cher Goh; Soo Chin Lee; Bengt Fredrik Petersson; Feng Gang Yu; Paul Macary; Min Zin Oo; Chan Soh Ha; Henry Yang; Seishi Ogawa; Kwok Seng Loh; H Phillip Koeffler
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  A new tumor suppressor LncRNA ADAMTS9-AS2 is regulated by DNMT1 and inhibits migration of glioma cells.

Authors:  Jie Yao; Baosheng Zhou; Jian Zhang; Peiliang Geng; Kang Liu; Yunfeng Zhu; Weijie Zhu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-05-15

3.  Genomic Landscape of Primary and Recurrent Anal Squamous Cell Carcinomas in Relation to HPV Integration, Copy-Number Variation, and DNA Damage Response Genes.

Authors:  Jordan Aldersley; David R Lorenz; Kent W Mouw; Alan D D'Andrea; Dana Gabuzda
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 4.  LRIG and cancer prognosis.

Authors:  David Lindquist; Samuel Kvarnbrink; Roger Henriksson; Håkan Hedman
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 4.089

5.  Identification of SEC62 as a potential marker for 3q amplification and cellular migration in dysplastic cervical lesions.

Authors:  Maximilian Linxweiler; Florian Bochen; Bernhard Schick; Silke Wemmert; Basel Al Kadah; Markus Greiner; Andrea Hasenfus; Rainer-Maria Bohle; Ingolf Juhasz-Böss; Erich-Franz Solomayer; Zoltan Ferenc Takacs
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  G protein-coupled receptor GPR160 is associated with apoptosis and cell cycle arrest of prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Caihong Zhou; Xinchuan Dai; Yi Chen; Yanyan Shen; Saifei Lei; Ting Xiao; Tamas Bartfai; Jian Ding; Ming-Wei Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-15

7.  Role and mechanism of action of LRIG1 in ovarian cancer cell line and VP16 drug-resistant cell line.

Authors:  Yaqi Zhang; Zhizhen Liu; Shunrui Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 8.  LRIG1 is a triple threat: ERBB negative regulator, intestinal stem cell marker and tumour suppressor.

Authors:  Y Wang; E J Poulin; R J Coffey
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Transcriptional cofactors Ski and SnoN are major regulators of the TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway in health and disease.

Authors:  Angeles C Tecalco-Cruz; Diana G Ríos-López; Genaro Vázquez-Victorio; Reyna E Rosales-Alvarez; Marina Macías-Silva
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2018-06-08

10.  Expression of LRIG1 is Associated With Good Prognosis for Human Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Yuzhi An; Zibo Zhao; Pengju Ou; Guangchuan Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.