Literature DB >> 19813776

Safety/Tolerability and efficacy of rivastigmine in taiwanese patients with Alzheimer's disease: a prospective post-marketing surveillance study.

Pai-Yi Chiu1, Dao-En Dai, Hai-Pei Hsu, Chao Lee, Juei-Jueng Lin, Hung-Chou Kuo, Ying-Chih Huang, Yung-Chang Liu, Ching-Piao Tsai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rivastigmine is approved for the symptomatic treatment of mild to moderate dementia in patients with Alzheimer's disease. The drug was launched in Taiwan in 2000. The primary objective of this post-marketing surveillance (PMS) study was to describe the safety/tolerability of treatment with rivastigmine capsules in patients with Alzheimer's disease. The secondary objectives of this study were to define the optimal titration pattern, maintenance dose, efficacy and patient satisfaction with treatment with rivastigmine capsules.
METHODS: This was a prospective, non-interventional post-marketing observational study in patients who met the criteria for mild or moderate Alzheimer's disease. The primary outcome measure for this trial was the incidence of emerging adverse events. Dosages related to titration patterns and maintenance doses were summarized. Efficacy evaluations conducted using the Mini-Mental State Examination, Clinical Dementia Rating and modified Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scales were also primary outcome measures, and results are shown descriptively. The patients' therapeutic responses to rivastigmine and satisfaction with rivastigmine were secondary outcome measures. Therapeutic response and treatment satisfaction were summarized descriptively.
RESULTS: A total of 264 patients were enrolled into the study. The mean duration of exposure to rivastigmine during the study was 151.1 days. Patients were taking rivastigmine 1.5-6 mg twice daily and the most frequent maintenance dose level was 4.5 mg twice daily. Among patients treated with rivastigmine, all primary and secondary outcome measures showed improvement or stabilization of cognition and global functioning. Of the 253 safety analysis patients, 155 patients (61.3%) reported at least one adverse event. The most frequent adverse events by system organ class were psychiatric disorders (9.1%) and gastrointestinal disorders (8.3%). The most common adverse events observed were dizziness (5.5%), insomnia (5.1%), anorexia (4.0%) and gastrointestinal symptoms such as constipation (4.0%), vomiting (4.0%) and nausea (3.6%). These symptoms were mild in severity. A total of 12 patients (4.7%) reported 16 serious adverse events, including two deaths, three fractures, three behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia, one syncope with head trauma, one peptic ulcer, and six other hospitalizations. None were reported to be related to rivastigmine.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of this study, rivastigmine administered usually at a dose of 3-6 mg twice daily was found to be well tolerated. Although the rate of adverse events was high, the majority of these symptoms were mild in severity and short in duration. This study also demonstrated the efficacy of rivastigmine in at least stabilizing the symptoms of Alzheimer's disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19813776     DOI: 10.2165/11315320-000000000-00000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  13 in total

1.  A 52-week study of the efficacy of rivastigmine in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  M Farlow; R Anand; J Messina; R Hartman; J Veach
Journal:  Eur Neurol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.710

2.  Should titration schedules for cholinesterase inhibitors be changed?

Authors:  Sudip Sikdar
Journal:  Int J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.485

Review 3.  Advances in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: benefits of dual cholinesterase inhibition.

Authors:  C G Ballard
Journal:  Eur Neurol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.710

Review 4.  Donepezil: a review of its use in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  M Dooley; H M Lamb
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  An open-label, comparative study of rivastigmine, donepezil and galantamine in a real-world setting.

Authors:  E Aguglia; M L Onor; M Saina; E Maso
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.580

6.  Efficacy and safety of rivastigmine in patients with Alzheimer's disease: international randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Rösler; R Anand; A Cicin-Sain; S Gauthier; Y Agid; P Dal-Bianco; H B Stähelin; R Hartman; M Gharabawi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-06

7.  Rivastigmine in Alzheimer disease: efficacy over two years.

Authors:  George Grossberg; Peter Irwin; Andrew Satlin; Peter Mesenbrink; René Spiegel
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.105

Review 8.  Diagnosis and treatment of dementia: 5. Nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapy for mild to moderate dementia.

Authors:  David B Hogan; Peter Bailey; Sandra Black; Anne Carswell; Howard Chertkow; Barry Clarke; Carole Cohen; John D Fisk; Dorothy Forbes; Malcolm Man-Son-Hing; Krista Lanctôt; Debra Morgan; Lilian Thorpe
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for treating dementia: evidence review for a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Parminder Raina; Pasqualina Santaguida; Afisi Ismaila; Christopher Patterson; David Cowan; Mitchell Levine; Lynda Booker; Mark Oremus
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Impact of Alzheimer's disease and rivastigmine treatment on activities of daily living over the course of mild to moderately severe disease.

Authors:  Steven G Potki; Ravi Anand; Richard Hartman; Jeffrey Veach; George Grossberg
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.