Literature DB >> 19813248

The Quid Pro Quo of pediatric versus adult services for older adolescent cancer patients.

Archie Bleyer1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Data from the State of Georgia suggest that pediatric cancers have better survival outcomes when treated at pediatric cancer centers that are members of the nation's Children's Oncology Group (COG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: To determine if the more adult types of cancer that occur in adolescents are better treated at centers with adult oncology expertise, the reported data were re-analyzed according to a scale that assessed whether the type of cancer was more likely to have been treated by oncologists with pediatric versus adult cancer experience.
RESULTS: The results showed that survival hazard index was linearly correlated in 15- to 19-year-olds with the pediatric versus adult cancer type index (P < 0.0001). All of the five most pediatric type of cancers had a better survival at COG institutions and all of the three tumors with a better survival at non-COG institutions had the highest adult type scores.
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that adolescent patients with pediatric types of cancer fare better when their care is conducted or supervised by oncologists who specialize in the care of their type of cancer. The Georgia data are among the first to indicate that the more adult type of cancers are better treated on an adult treatment regimen and/or under the supervision or in conjunction with adult-treating oncologists. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19813248     DOI: 10.1002/pbc.22190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer        ISSN: 1545-5009            Impact factor:   3.167


  5 in total

1.  Adolescent oncology: who cares?-the new KID on the block.

Authors:  Vivek Subbiah
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Who Treats Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer? A Report from the AYA HOPE Study.

Authors:  Helen M Parsons; Linda C Harlan; Susanne Schmidt; Theresa H M Keegan; Charles F Lynch; Erin E Kent; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Stephen M Schwartz; Roland L Chu; Gretchen Keel; Ashley Wilder Smith
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.223

3.  Resource Utilization and Costs in Adolescents Treated for Cancer in Pediatric vs Adult Institutions.

Authors:  Paul C Nathan; Karen E Bremner; Ning Liu; Sumit Gupta; Mark L Greenberg; Mary L McBride; Murray D Krahn; Claire de Oliveira
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  The Initiative to Maximize Progress in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Therapy (IMPACT) Cohort Study: a population-based cohort of young Canadians with cancer.

Authors:  Nancy N Baxter; Corinne Daly; Sumit Gupta; Jason D Pole; Rinku Sutradhar; Mark L Greenberg; Paul C Nathan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Central nervous system germ cell tumor, an archetypal AYA tumor and a model for pediatric and neuro-oncology collaboration, review from the EURACAN domain 10 group.

Authors:  Cecile Faure Conter; Gabriele Calaminus; James Nicholson; Ahmed Idbaih; Khê Hoang Xuan; Alexandre Vasiljevic; Giovanni Morana; Alexandru Szathmari; Thankamma Ajithkumar; Didier Frappaz
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 5.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.