OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of a prediction model for pre-eclampsia (PE) in the first trimester (Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:742-794) for the prediction of late (>34 weeks) and early (< or =34 weeks) PE in a high-risk population. METHODS: Longitudinal study performed in 152 high-risk pregnancies with at least one high-risk condition: previous PE, hypertension, pregestational diabetes, renal disease, obesity, hyperlipidemia, autoimmune disorders, thrombophilia or recurrent pregnancy loss. Mean uterine artery pulsatility index at 11 to 13 + 6 weeks and a series of maternal variables were combined in order to obtain the estimated 'a posteriori risk for PE' in each woman. This risk for unaffected women was compared with that for patients who subsequently developed late and early PE. The performance of such approach was described by receiver-operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Late PE developed in 13 (8.6%) pregnancies and early PE in seven (4.6%). The median 'a posteriori risk for PE' in the unaffected, late PE, and early PE groups was 0.62%, 1.22%, and 2.49% (P < 0.01), respectively. For a false-positive rate of 10%, the detection rates of late and early PE were 23.1 and 42.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This referenced model shows a modest performance when applied to high-risk women.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of a prediction model for pre-eclampsia (PE) in the first trimester (Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:742-794) for the prediction of late (>34 weeks) and early (< or =34 weeks) PE in a high-risk population. METHODS: Longitudinal study performed in 152 high-risk pregnancies with at least one high-risk condition: previous PE, hypertension, pregestational diabetes, renal disease, obesity, hyperlipidemia, autoimmune disorders, thrombophilia or recurrent pregnancy loss. Mean uterine artery pulsatility index at 11 to 13 + 6 weeks and a series of maternal variables were combined in order to obtain the estimated 'a posteriori risk for PE' in each woman. This risk for unaffected women was compared with that for patients who subsequently developed late and early PE. The performance of such approach was described by receiver-operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Late PE developed in 13 (8.6%) pregnancies and early PE in seven (4.6%). The median 'a posteriori risk for PE' in the unaffected, late PE, and early PE groups was 0.62%, 1.22%, and 2.49% (P < 0.01), respectively. For a false-positive rate of 10%, the detection rates of late and early PE were 23.1 and 42.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This referenced model shows a modest performance when applied to high-risk women.
Authors: Katherine R Goetzinger; Methodius G Tuuli; Alison G Cahill; George A Macones; Anthony O Odibo Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2014-04-04 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: John Allotey; Kym Ie Snell; Melanie Smuk; Richard Hooper; Claire L Chan; Asif Ahmed; Lucy C Chappell; Peter von Dadelszen; Julie Dodds; Marcus Green; Louise Kenny; Asma Khalil; Khalid S Khan; Ben W Mol; Jenny Myers; Lucilla Poston; Basky Thilaganathan; Anne C Staff; Gordon Cs Smith; Wessel Ganzevoort; Hannele Laivuori; Anthony O Odibo; Javier A Ramírez; John Kingdom; George Daskalakis; Diane Farrar; Ahmet A Baschat; Paul T Seed; Federico Prefumo; Fabricio da Silva Costa; Henk Groen; Francois Audibert; Jacques Masse; Ragnhild B Skråstad; Kjell Å Salvesen; Camilla Haavaldsen; Chie Nagata; Alice R Rumbold; Seppo Heinonen; Lisa M Askie; Luc Jm Smits; Christina A Vinter; Per M Magnus; Kajantie Eero; Pia M Villa; Anne K Jenum; Louise B Andersen; Jane E Norman; Akihide Ohkuchi; Anne Eskild; Sohinee Bhattacharya; Fionnuala M McAuliffe; Alberto Galindo; Ignacio Herraiz; Lionel Carbillon; Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch; SeonAe Yeo; Helena J Teede; Joyce L Browne; Karel Gm Moons; Richard D Riley; Shakila Thangaratinam Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Robyn A North; Lesley M E McCowan; Gustaaf A Dekker; Lucilla Poston; Eliza H Y Chan; Alistair W Stewart; Michael A Black; Rennae S Taylor; James J Walker; Philip N Baker; Louise C Kenny Journal: BMJ Date: 2011-04-07
Authors: Katja Murtoniemi; Pia M Villa; Jaakko Matomäki; Elina Keikkala; Piia Vuorela; Esa Hämäläinen; Eero Kajantie; Anu-Katriina Pesonen; Katri Räikkönen; Pekka Taipale; Ulf-Håkan Stenman; Hannele Laivuori Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2018-07-03 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Edward Antwi; Mary Amoakoh-Coleman; Dorice L Vieira; Shreya Madhavaram; Kwadwo A Koram; Diederick E Grobbee; Irene A Agyepong; Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kym I E Snell; John Allotey; Melanie Smuk; Richard Hooper; Claire Chan; Asif Ahmed; Lucy C Chappell; Peter Von Dadelszen; Marcus Green; Louise Kenny; Asma Khalil; Khalid S Khan; Ben W Mol; Jenny Myers; Lucilla Poston; Basky Thilaganathan; Anne C Staff; Gordon C S Smith; Wessel Ganzevoort; Hannele Laivuori; Anthony O Odibo; Javier Arenas Ramírez; John Kingdom; George Daskalakis; Diane Farrar; Ahmet A Baschat; Paul T Seed; Federico Prefumo; Fabricio da Silva Costa; Henk Groen; Francois Audibert; Jacques Masse; Ragnhild B Skråstad; Kjell Å Salvesen; Camilla Haavaldsen; Chie Nagata; Alice R Rumbold; Seppo Heinonen; Lisa M Askie; Luc J M Smits; Christina A Vinter; Per Magnus; Kajantie Eero; Pia M Villa; Anne K Jenum; Louise B Andersen; Jane E Norman; Akihide Ohkuchi; Anne Eskild; Sohinee Bhattacharya; Fionnuala M McAuliffe; Alberto Galindo; Ignacio Herraiz; Lionel Carbillon; Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch; Seon Ae Yeo; Joyce L Browne; Karel G M Moons; Richard D Riley; Shakila Thangaratinam Journal: BMC Med Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Linda Jacqueline Elisabeth Meertens; Hubertina Cj Scheepers; Raymond G De Vries; Carmen D Dirksen; Irene Korstjens; Antonius Lm Mulder; Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze; Jan G Nijhuis; Marc Ea Spaanderman; Luc Jm Smits Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2017-10-26