Literature DB >> 19813048

Is the Irish bedside best?

E L Callaly1, M Yusra, S Sreenan, P McCormack.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of the bedside to teach the art of clinical medicine is controversial. Rising student numbers can limit patient availability. Studies examining inpatient attitudes to bedside teaching are few. AIMS: We examined inpatients' attitudes to bedside teaching of undergraduate medical students.
METHODS: The study was carried out in a 439-bed teaching hospital. A questionnaire, numerically scored (0-10), was prospectively administered to 102 consecutive patients involved in bedside teaching of undergraduate medical students.
RESULTS: The results were available from 92 patients. Patients enjoyed the teaching process (mean score 9.13 +/- 1.16) and benefited from a better understanding of their illness (7.11 +/- 2.57). Patients appreciated their role in educating future doctors (mean score 9.52 +/- 1.11) but demonstrated less confidence in their personal contribution to the teaching process (7.81 +/- 1.89).
CONCLUSIONS: Inpatients are very willing participants in bedside teaching of undergraduate medical students.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19813048     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-009-0436-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  8 in total

1.  What is happening to bedside clinical teaching?

Authors:  M El-Bagir K Ahmed
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Bedside rounds revisited.

Authors:  G E Thibault
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Impact on patients of expanded, general practice based, student teaching: observational and qualitative study.

Authors:  John Benson; Thelma Quince; Arthur Hibble; Thomas Fanshawe; Jon Emery
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-04

4.  The importance of the history in the medical clinic and the cost of unnecessary tests.

Authors:  G Sandler
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Sounding Boards. The case of bedside rounds.

Authors:  E W Linfors; F A Neelon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-11-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  On bedside teaching.

Authors:  M A LaCombe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Bedside case presentations: why patients like them but learners don't.

Authors:  R M Wang-Cheng; G P Barnas; P Sigmann; P A Riendl; M J Young
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  The effect of bedside case presentations on patients' perceptions of their medical care.

Authors:  L S Lehmann; F L Brancati; M C Chen; D Roter; A S Dobs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Back to the bedside: the role of bedside teaching in the modern era.

Authors:  Zeshan Qureshi
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2014-04

2.  Bedside teaching in medical education: a literature review.

Authors:  Max Peters; Olle Ten Cate
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2014-04

3.  Patients' attitude towards bedside teaching in Tunisia.

Authors:  Arwa Ben Salah; Sana El Mhamdi; Ines Bouanene; Asma Sriha; Mohamed Soltani
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2015-12-25

4.  Patient perspectives of bedside teaching in an obstetrics, Gynaecology and neonatology hospital.

Authors:  Michelle Carty; Nicola O'Riordan; Mary Ivers; Mary F Higgins
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.463

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.