Literature DB >> 19812591

Neonatal outcomes associated with planned vaginal versus planned primary cesarean delivery.

E J Geller1, J M Wu, M L Jannelli, T V Nguyen, A G Visco.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether planned route of delivery leads to differences in neonatal morbidity. STUDY
DESIGN: Analysis was based on planned route of delivery, not actual route of delivery. A total of 4048 subjects were divided into two groups: planned vaginal delivery and planned cesarean delivery. Primary outcomes were neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, respiratory morbidity and neurologic morbidity. RESULT: There were 3868 planned vaginal and 180 planned cesarean deliveries. Planned vaginal delivery had decreased NICU admission (P<0.0001), oxygen resuscitation (P=0.001) and jaundice (P<0.0001) but increased meconium passage (P<0.0001) and 1 min Apgar <or=5 (P=0.02). After multivariable regression, NICU admission remained lower and meconium passage remained higher in the planned vaginal group.
CONCLUSION: Planned vaginal delivery led to more meconium passage and low 1 min Apgar but less NICU admissions, oxygen resuscitation and jaundice. Multicenter trials are needed to assess rare but serious outcomes based on planned route of delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19812591     DOI: 10.1038/jp.2009.150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinatol        ISSN: 0743-8346            Impact factor:   2.521


  12 in total

1.  Cesarean birth and maternal morbidity among Black women and White women after implementation of a blended payment policy.

Authors:  Jonathan M Snowden; Sarah S Osmundson; Menolly Kaufman; Cori Blauer Peterson; Katy Backes Kozhimannil
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Association of mode of delivery with offspring pubertal development in Project Viva: a prospective pre-birth cohort study in the USA.

Authors:  Izzuddin M Aris; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Joanne E Sordillo; Marie-France Hivert; Emily Oken; Jorge E Chavarro
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Neonatal complications in public and private patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Sarah Stock; Fatima Haggar; Geoffrey Hammond; Amanda T Langridge; David B Preen; Nick De Klerk; Helen Leonard; Fiona J Stanley
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Elective cesarean section or not? Maternal age and risk of adverse outcomes at term: a population-based registry study of low-risk primiparous women.

Authors:  Lina Herstad; Kari Klungsøyr; Rolv Skjærven; Tom Tanbo; Lisa Forsén; Thomas Åbyholm; Siri Vangen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Meconium microbiome associates with the development of neonatal jaundice.

Authors:  Tianyu Dong; Ting Chen; Richard Allen White; Xu Wang; Weiyue Hu; Yali Liang; Yuqing Zhang; Chuncheng Lu; Minjian Chen; Heidi Aase; Yankai Xia
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of natural birth and elective C-section in supplemental health.

Authors:  Aline Piovezan Entringer; Márcia Pinto; Maria Auxiliadora de Souza Mendes Gomes
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 2.106

7.  Increase in caesarean deliveries after the Australian Private Health Insurance Incentive policy reforms.

Authors:  Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Anna Kemp; Fatima A Haggar; Rachael E Moorin; Anthony S Gunnell; David B Preen; Fiona J Stanley; C D'Arcy J Holman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Role of public and private funding in the rising caesarean section rate: a cohort study.

Authors:  Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Fatima Haggar; Gavin Pereira; Helen Leonard; Nick de Klerk; Fiona J Stanley; Sarah Stock
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Neonatal outcomes after preterm birth by mothers' health insurance status at birth: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Fatima A Haggar; Amanda T Langridge; Anthony S Gunnell; Helen Leonard; Fiona J Stanley
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Organisational interventions designed to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Alison M Hutchinson; Cate Nagle; Bridie Kent; Debra Bick; Rebecca Lindberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.