Literature DB >> 19812102

Effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on quality of care: a systematic review.

M Lugtenberg1, J S Burgers, G P Westert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based clinical guidelines aim to improve the quality of care. In The Netherlands, considerable time and effort have been invested in the development and implementation of evidence-based guidelines since the 1990s. Thus far, no reviews are available on their effectiveness. The primary aim of this article was to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of Dutch evidence-based clinical guidelines in improving the quality of care.
METHODS: A systematic review of studies evaluating the effects of Dutch evidence-based guidelines on both the process and structure of care and patient outcomes was conducted. The electronic databases Medline and Embase (1990-2007) and relevant scientific journals were searched. Studies were only selected if they included a controlled trial, an interrupted time series design or a before and after design.
RESULTS: A total of 20 studies were included. In 17 of 19 studies that measured the effects on the process or structure of care, significant improvements were reported. Thirteen of these studies reported improvement with respect to some of the recommendations studied. In addition, the size of the observed effects varied largely across the recommendations within guidelines. Six of nine studies that measured patient health outcomes showed significant but small improvements as a result of the use of clinical guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates that Dutch evidence-based clinical guidelines can be effective in improving the process and structure of care. The effects of guidelines on patient health outcomes were studied far less and data are less convincing. The high level of variation in effects across recommendations suggests that implementation strategies tailored to individual recommendations within the guideline are needed to establish relevant improvements in healthcare. Moreover, the results highlight the need for well-designed studies focusing on the level of the recommendations to determine which factors influence guideline utilisation and improved patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19812102     DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2008.028043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care        ISSN: 1475-3898


  127 in total

1.  The use of three strategies to improve quality of care at a national level.

Authors:  Jeannette P P So; James G Wright
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The effect of the perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists upon clinical practices.

Authors:  Donald S Likosky; Daniel C FitzGerald; Robert C Groom; Dwayne K Jones; Robert A Baker; Kenneth G Shann; C David Mazer; Bruce D Spiess; Simon C Body
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2010-06

Review 3.  The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptoms to diagnosis.

Authors:  Larissa Nekhlyudov; Steven Latosinsky
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

4.  The Clinical Practice Guideline Initiative: A joint collaboration designed to improve the quality of care delivered by doctors of chiropractic.

Authors:  André Bussières; Kent Stuber
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2013-12

5.  Adherence to and uptake of clinical practice guidelines: lessons learned from a clinical practice guideline on chemotherapy concomitant with radiotherapy in head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  S F Hall; J C Irish; R W Gregg; P A Groome; S Rohland
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 6.  Guidelines in the management of CNS tumors.

Authors:  Navid Redjal; Andrew S Venteicher; Danielle Dang; Andrew Sloan; Remi A Kessler; Rebecca R Baron; Constantinos G Hadjipanayis; Clark C Chen; Mateo Ziu; Jeffrey J Olson; Brian V Nahed
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Primary care guidelines-a resident's perspective.

Authors:  Ruben Hummelen
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Translating Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Sports-Related Concussion Into Practice.

Authors:  Alex Donaldson; Joshua Newton; Paul McCrory; Peta White; Gavin Davis; Michael Makdissi; Caroline F Finch
Journal:  Am J Lifestyle Med       Date:  2014-06-19

9.  National trends in the utilization of partial nephrectomy before and after the establishment of AUA guidelines for the management of renal masses.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Dawn Walter; Glen B Taksler; William C Huang; James S Wysock; Ganesh Sivarajan; Stacy Loeb; Samir S Taneja; Danil V Makarov
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Why don't physicians adhere to guideline recommendations in practice? An analysis of barriers among Dutch general practitioners.

Authors:  Marjolein Lugtenberg; Judith M Zegers-van Schaick; Gert P Westert; Jako S Burgers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.