BACKGROUND: Insight into co-morbidity and treatment effects is pivotal to improve quality of care for cancer patients. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether linkage of the Eindhoven Cancer Registry (ECR) and the PHARMO Record Linkage System (RLS) was technically feasible and to assess which patient-centric data would result from this linkage. METHODS: The ECR records data on tumour stage and primary treatment of all newly diagnosed cancer patients in the southeastern Netherlands including co-morbidity at diagnosis, whereas the PHARMO RLS includes data from multiple linked observational databases such as data on drug utilisation (for both in- and out-patients, including chemotherapy), hospitalisations and clinical laboratory measurements. All patients who lived or had been living in the overlapping area served by the ECR and the PHARMO RLS during 1998-2006 were selected for linkage which was performed with probabilistic medical record linkage. RESULTS: The linkage resulted in an ECR-PHARMO cohort of 40,004 cancer patients with a total of 42,767 primary tumours. The cancer patients in the linked ECR-PHARMO cohort were representatives for the cancer patients included in the total ECR during 1998-2006. Cancer patients included in the cohorts had a mean history of 5 years and a mean follow-up ranging from 2 to more than 4 years (dependent on the survival rate of the specific cancer type). CONCLUSIONS: Linkage of ECR and the PHARMO RLS creates the possibility to study patient-centric drug utilisation, health resources utilisation and their costs, in addition to the effectiveness and safety of pharmaceuticals in routine daily practice in cancer patients. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Insight into co-morbidity and treatment effects is pivotal to improve quality of care for cancerpatients. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether linkage of the Eindhoven Cancer Registry (ECR) and the PHARMO Record Linkage System (RLS) was technically feasible and to assess which patient-centric data would result from this linkage. METHODS: The ECR records data on tumour stage and primary treatment of all newly diagnosed cancerpatients in the southeastern Netherlands including co-morbidity at diagnosis, whereas the PHARMO RLS includes data from multiple linked observational databases such as data on drug utilisation (for both in- and out-patients, including chemotherapy), hospitalisations and clinical laboratory measurements. All patients who lived or had been living in the overlapping area served by the ECR and the PHARMO RLS during 1998-2006 were selected for linkage which was performed with probabilistic medical record linkage. RESULTS: The linkage resulted in an ECR-PHARMO cohort of 40,004 cancerpatients with a total of 42,767 primary tumours. The cancerpatients in the linked ECR-PHARMO cohort were representatives for the cancerpatients included in the total ECR during 1998-2006. Cancerpatients included in the cohorts had a mean history of 5 years and a mean follow-up ranging from 2 to more than 4 years (dependent on the survival rate of the specific cancer type). CONCLUSIONS: Linkage of ECR and the PHARMO RLS creates the possibility to study patient-centric drug utilisation, health resources utilisation and their costs, in addition to the effectiveness and safety of pharmaceuticals in routine daily practice in cancerpatients. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Silvia Ravera; Nienke van Rein; Johan J de Gier; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Marjolein M J Zanders; Harm R Haak; Myrthe P P van Herk-Sukel; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Jeffrey A Johnson Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2015-02-01 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Eric I Benchimol; Liam Smeeth; Astrid Guttmann; Katie Harron; David Moher; Irene Petersen; Henrik T Sørensen; Jean-Marie Januel; Erik von Elm; Sinéad M Langan Journal: CMAJ Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: E Houben; H G M van Haalen; W Sparreboom; J A Overbeek; N P M Ezendam; J M A Pijnenborg; J L Severens; M P P van Herk-Sukel Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2017-02-21 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Willemien J Kruik-Kollöffel; Enriqueta Vallejo-Yagüe; Kris L L Movig; Gerard C M Linssen; Edith M Heintjes; Job van der Palen Journal: Int J Clin Pharm Date: 2022-05-28
Authors: Mehmet Kuzu; Murat Kantarcioglu; Elizabeth Ashley Durham; Csaba Toth; Bradley Malin Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2012-07-30 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Satu J Siiskonen; Els R Koomen; Loes E Visser; Ron M C Herings; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Tamar E C Nijsten Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Olga Husson; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Judith B Prins; Martin J van den Bent; Mies C van Eenbergen; Renske Fles; Eveliene Manten-Horst; Jourik A Gietema; Winette T A van der Graaf Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 6.639
Authors: Thomas Crezee; Marika H Tesselaar; James Nagarajah; Willem E Corver; Johannes Morreau; Catrin Pritchard; Shioko Kimura; Josephina G Kuiper; Ilse van Engen-van Grunsven; Jan W A Smit; Romana T Netea-Maier; Theo S Plantinga Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 6.730