Literature DB >> 19811813

Unintended imitation in nonword repetition.

Juliane Kappes1, Annette Baumgaertner, Claudia Peschke, Wolfram Ziegler.   

Abstract

Verbal repetition is conventionally considered to require motor-reproduction of only the phonologically relevant content of a perceived linguistic stimulus, while imitation of incidental acoustic properties of the stimulus is not an explicit part of this task. Exemplar-based theories of speech processing, however, would predict that imitation beyond linguistic reproduction may occur in word repetition. Five experiments were conducted in which verbal audio-motor translations had to be performed under different conditions. Nonwords varying in phonemic content, in vocal pitch (F(0)), and in speaking style (schwa-syllable expression) were presented. We experimentally varied the factors response delay (repetition vs. shadowing), intention-to-repeat (repetition vs. pseudo-naming), and phonological load (repetition vs. transformation). The responses of ten healthy participants were examined for phonemic accuracy and for traces of para-phonological imitation. Two aphasic patients with phonological impairments were also included, to find out if lesions to left anterior or posterior perisylvian cortex interfere with imitation. In the healthy participants, significant imitation of both F(0) and phonetic style was observed, with markedly stronger effects for the latter. Strong imitation was also found in an aphasic patient with a lesion to left anterior perisylvian cortex, whereas almost no imitation occurred in a patient with a lesion to the posterior language area. The degree of unintended imitation was modulated by each of the three independent factors introduced here. The results are discussed on the background of cognitive and neurolinguistic theories of imitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19811813     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2009.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  15 in total

Review 1.  Computational neuroanatomy of speech production.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Sensorimotor integration in speech processing: computational basis and neural organization.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; John Houde; Feng Rong
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Vocal alignment to native and non-native speakers of English.

Authors:  Eva M Lewandowski; Lynne C Nygaard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Nonspeech Oral Movements and Oral Motor Disorders: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Ray D Kent
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  The architecture of speech production and the role of the phoneme in speech processing.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2014-01-01

6.  Right-hemispheric processing of non-linguistic word features: implications for mapping language recovery after stroke.

Authors:  Annette Baumgaertner; Gesa Hartwigsen; Hartwig Roman Siebner
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Perception drives production across sensory modalities: A network for sensorimotor integration of visual speech.

Authors:  Jonathan H Venezia; Paul Fillmore; William Matchin; A Lisette Isenberg; Gregory Hickok; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Prediction and imitation in speech.

Authors:  Chiara Gambi; Martin J Pickering
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-21

9.  T'ain't what you say, it's the way that you say it--left insula and inferior frontal cortex work in interaction with superior temporal regions to control the performance of vocal impersonations.

Authors:  Carolyn McGettigan; Frank Eisner; Zarinah K Agnew; Tom Manly; Duncan Wisbey; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Accent imitation positively affects language attitudes.

Authors:  Patti Adank; Andrew J Stewart; Louise Connell; Jeffrey Wood
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.