K A Glashouwer1, P J de Jong. 1. Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Groningen, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands. k.a.glashouwer@rug.nl
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cognitive theory points to the importance of negative self-schemas in the onset and maintenance of depression and anxiety disorders. Hereby, it is important to distinguish between automatic and explicit self-schemas, reflecting different cognitive-motivational systems. This study tested whether patients with a current major depression and/or anxiety disorder are characterized by automatic self-anxious and self-depressive associations and whether these associations are disorder specific. METHOD: Patients (n=2329) and non-clinical controls (n=652) were tested as part of The Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety, a multi-center, longitudinal, cohort study with patients from different health care settings. Patient groups and non-clinical controls (18-65 years of age) were compared with regard to automatic self-anxious and self-depressive associations measured with the Implicit Association Test. RESULTS: Individuals with an anxiety disorder showed enhanced self-anxious associations, whereas individuals with a depression showed enhanced self-depressive associations. Individuals with co-morbid disorders scored high on both automatic self-associations. Although remitted individuals showed weaker automatic self-associations than people with a current disorder, their automatic self-anxious/depressed associations were still significantly stronger than those of the control group. Importantly, automatic self-associations showed predictive validity for the severity of anxious and depressive symptoms over and above explicit self-beliefs. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first evidence that automatic self-anxious and self-depressive associations are differentially involved in anxiety disorders and depression. This may help to explain the refractoriness of these disorders and points to the potential importance of automatic self-associations in the development of psychopathological symptoms.
BACKGROUND: Cognitive theory points to the importance of negative self-schemas in the onset and maintenance of depression and anxiety disorders. Hereby, it is important to distinguish between automatic and explicit self-schemas, reflecting different cognitive-motivational systems. This study tested whether patients with a current major depression and/or anxiety disorder are characterized by automatic self-anxious and self-depressive associations and whether these associations are disorder specific. METHOD:Patients (n=2329) and non-clinical controls (n=652) were tested as part of The Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety, a multi-center, longitudinal, cohort study with patients from different health care settings. Patient groups and non-clinical controls (18-65 years of age) were compared with regard to automatic self-anxious and self-depressive associations measured with the Implicit Association Test. RESULTS: Individuals with an anxiety disorder showed enhanced self-anxious associations, whereas individuals with a depression showed enhanced self-depressive associations. Individuals with co-morbid disorders scored high on both automatic self-associations. Although remitted individuals showed weaker automatic self-associations than people with a current disorder, their automatic self-anxious/depressed associations were still significantly stronger than those of the control group. Importantly, automatic self-associations showed predictive validity for the severity of anxious and depressive symptoms over and above explicit self-beliefs. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first evidence that automatic self-anxious and self-depressive associations are differentially involved in anxiety disorders and depression. This may help to explain the refractoriness of these disorders and points to the potential importance of automatic self-associations in the development of psychopathological symptoms.
Authors: Nynke A Groenewold; Annelieke M Roest; Remco J Renken; Esther M Opmeer; Dick J Veltman; Nic J A van der Wee; Peter de Jonge; André Aleman; Catherine J Harmer Journal: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Alexandra J Werntz; Shari A Steinman; Jeffrey J Glenn; Matthew K Nock; Bethany A Teachman Journal: J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry Date: 2016-03-03
Authors: Leonie Manthey; Fawzia van Loenen-Frösch; Erik J Giltay; Tineke van Veen; Klaske Glashouwer; Brenda W J H Penninx; Frans G Zitman Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Katherine S Button; Daphne Kounali; Lexine Stapinski; Ronald M Rapee; Glyn Lewis; Marcus R Munafò Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yvonne Egenolf; Maria Stein; Thomas Koenig; Martin Grosse Holtforth; Thomas Dierks; Franz Caspar Journal: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.526
Authors: Anne-Wil Kruijt; Niki Antypa; Linda Booij; Peter J de Jong; Klaske Glashouwer; Brenda W J H Penninx; Willem Van der Does Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-26 Impact factor: 3.240